Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (APWC) vs Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC)

A side-by-side comparison of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited and Quest Resource Holding Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — APWC vs QRHC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
APWC -36.9% (-4.5%/yr)QRHC -32.4% (-3.8%/yr)QRHC compounded faster over this window
100200300400500Start $10020182020202220242026$63$68
APWC QRHC

APWC vs QRHC: by the numbers

  • •QRHC is the larger company ($29M vs $27M market cap).
  • •APWC is profitable (1.28% net margin) while QRHC runs a net loss (-7.07%).
  • •QRHC grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.00% vs 5.19% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAPWCQRHC
P/E ratio4.20N/A
P/S ratio0.050.12
P/B ratio0.131.07
EV / EBITDA1.71N/A
FCF yieldN/A36.48%

Profitability

MetricAPWCQRHC
Gross margin8.28%15.52%
Operating margin2.51%-3.37%
Net margin1.28%-7.07%
ROE3.31%-65.48%
ROIC2.93%-9.25%

Growth (annualized)

MetricAPWCQRHC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)5.19%15.00%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A10.49%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-14.75%-26.17%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, APWC or QRHC?
Over the past five years, QRHC grew revenue faster — APWC at a 5.19% CAGR versus QRHC at 15.00%.
Is APWC or QRHC more profitable?
APWC runs the higher net margin — APWC at 1.28% versus QRHC at -7.07%.
How have APWC and QRHC total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, APWC delivered -5.15% and QRHC delivered -3.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.