Which has the lower trailing P/E, APWC or CVV?

CVV has the lower trailing P/E: APWC trades at 4.44 and CVV at 3.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, APWC or CVV?

Over the past five years, APWC grew revenue faster — APWC at a 5.19% CAGR versus CVV at 2.09%.

Is APWC or CVV more profitable?

CVV runs the higher net margin — APWC at 1.28% versus CVV at 62.01%.

How have APWC and CVV total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, APWC delivered -5.15% and CVV delivered -6.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (APWC) vs CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV)

A side-by-side comparison of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited and CVD Equipment Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

APWC

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited

$28M

$1.37IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 9:41 AM EDT

CVV

CVD Equipment Corporation

$30M

$4.35IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 9:50 AM EDT

Total return — APWC vs CVV

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

APWC -36.9% (-4.5%/yr)CVV -51.2% (-6.9%/yr)APWC compounded faster over this window

APWC CVV

APWC vs CVV: by the numbers

•CVV is the larger company ($30M vs $28M market cap).
•CVV trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (3.03 vs 4.44 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CVV converts more revenue to profit (62.01% vs 1.28% net margin).
•APWC grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.19% vs 2.09% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APWC	CVV
P/E ratio	4.44	3.03
P/S ratio	0.05	1.87
P/B ratio	0.14	0.84
EV / EBITDA	1.83	N/A
FCF yield	N/A	1.53%

Profitability

Metric	APWC	CVV
Gross margin	8.28%	24.73%
Operating margin	2.51%	-6.77%
Net margin	1.28%	62.01%
ROE	3.31%	27.79%
ROIC	2.93%	-11.85%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APWC	CVV
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.19%	2.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-14.75%	-1.26%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, APWC or CVV?: CVV has the lower trailing P/E: APWC trades at 4.44 and CVV at 3.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, APWC or CVV?: Over the past five years, APWC grew revenue faster — APWC at a 5.19% CAGR versus CVV at 2.09%.
Is APWC or CVV more profitable?: CVV runs the higher net margin — APWC at 1.28% versus CVV at 62.01%.
How have APWC and CVV total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, APWC delivered -5.15% and CVV delivered -6.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APWC analysis Full CVV analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable P/E ratio CVD Equipment P/E ratio Asia Pacific Wire & Cable ROE CVD Equipment ROE Asia Pacific Wire & Cable operating margin CVD Equipment operating margin Asia Pacific Wire & Cable revenue growth CVD Equipment revenue growth Asia Pacific Wire & Cable free cash flow CVD Equipment free cash flow

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable & CVD Equipment appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.