Which has the lower trailing P/E, APWC or CTRM?

CTRM has the lower trailing P/E: APWC trades at 4.20 and CTRM at 1.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, APWC or CTRM?

Over the past five years, CTRM grew revenue faster — APWC at a 5.19% CAGR versus CTRM at 20.25%.

Is APWC or CTRM more profitable?

CTRM runs the higher net margin — APWC at 1.28% versus CTRM at 109.09%.

How have APWC and CTRM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, APWC delivered -14.75% and CTRM delivered -26.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (APWC) vs Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM)

A side-by-side comparison of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited and Castor Maritime Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

APWC

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited

$27M

$1.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CTRM

Castor Maritime Inc.

$19M

$1.95IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — APWC vs CTRM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

APWC -40.9% (-6.4%/yr)CTRM -99.0% (-43.9%/yr)APWC compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

APWC CTRM

APWC vs CTRM: by the numbers

•APWC is the larger company ($27M vs $19M market cap).
•CTRM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (1.27 vs 4.20 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CTRM converts more revenue to profit (109.09% vs 1.28% net margin).
•CTRM grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.25% vs 5.19% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APWC	CTRM
P/E ratio	4.20	1.27
P/S ratio	0.05	0.21
P/B ratio	0.13	0.03
EV / EBITDA	1.71	2.82

Profitability

Metric	APWC	CTRM
Gross margin	8.28%	29.97%
Operating margin	2.51%	-0.11%
Net margin	1.28%	109.09%
ROE	3.31%	17.00%
ROIC	2.93%	1.12%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APWC	CTRM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.19%	20.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-14.75%	-26.69%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, APWC or CTRM?: CTRM has the lower trailing P/E: APWC trades at 4.20 and CTRM at 1.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, APWC or CTRM?: Over the past five years, CTRM grew revenue faster — APWC at a 5.19% CAGR versus CTRM at 20.25%.
Is APWC or CTRM more profitable?: CTRM runs the higher net margin — APWC at 1.28% versus CTRM at 109.09%.
How have APWC and CTRM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, APWC delivered -14.75% and CTRM delivered -26.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APWC analysis Full CTRM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable P/E ratio Castor Maritime P/E ratio Asia Pacific Wire & Cable ROE Castor Maritime ROE Asia Pacific Wire & Cable operating margin Castor Maritime operating margin Asia Pacific Wire & Cable revenue growth Castor Maritime revenue growth Asia Pacific Wire & Cable free cash flow Castor Maritime free cash flow

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable & Castor Maritime appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.