Which has the lower trailing P/E, APTV or LULU?

LULU has the lower trailing P/E: APTV trades at 34.58 and LULU at 9.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, APTV or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — APTV at a 9.13% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.

Is APTV or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — APTV at 1.77% versus LULU at 13.03%.

How have APTV and LULU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, APTV delivered 0.96% and LULU delivered 4.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Aptiv PLC (APTV) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

A side-by-side comparison of Aptiv PLC and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

APTV

Aptiv PLC

$11.95B

$56.47Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.50B

$118.87Consumer CyclicalAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — APTV vs LULU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 15y

APTV +287.9%LULU +125.5%APTV compounded faster

APTV LULU

APTV vs LULU: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.50B vs $11.95B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.63 vs 34.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 1.77% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 9.13% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APTV	LULU
P/E ratio	34.58	9.63
Forward P/E	9.82	9.11
P/S ratio	0.60	1.23
P/B ratio	1.35	2.84
PEG ratio	N/A	0.40
EV / EBITDA	8.68	5.61
FCF yield	8.79%	9.33%

Profitability

Metric	APTV	LULU
Gross margin	19.13%	55.70%
Operating margin	5.53%	18.21%
Net margin	1.77%	13.03%
ROE	3.95%	30.25%
ROIC	1.31%	22.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APTV	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.13%	17.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-35.51%	24.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.94%	-1.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-19.47%	-21.55%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, APTV or LULU?: LULU has the lower trailing P/E: APTV trades at 34.58 and LULU at 9.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, APTV or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — APTV at a 9.13% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
Is APTV or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — APTV at 1.77% versus LULU at 13.03%.
How have APTV and LULU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, APTV delivered 0.96% and LULU delivered 4.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APTV analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Aptiv P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Aptiv dividend yield Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Aptiv ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Aptiv operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Aptiv revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Aptiv free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Aptiv & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.