Which has the lower trailing P/E, APTV or LULU?

LULU has the lower trailing P/E: APTV trades at 41.27 and LULU at 7.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, APTV or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — APTV at a 3.57% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.

Is APTV or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — APTV at 1.17% versus LULU at 12.78%.

How have APTV and LULU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, APTV delivered -1.31% and LULU delivered 4.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Aptiv PLC (APTV) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

A side-by-side comparison of Aptiv PLC and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

APTV

Aptiv PLC

$9.17B

$43.33Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$10.90B

$95.98Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — APTV vs LULU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

APTV -12.9% (-1.4%/yr)LULU +49.6% (+4.1%/yr)LULU compounded faster over this window

APTV LULU

APTV vs LULU: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($10.90B vs $9.17B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.89 vs 41.27 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (12.78% vs 1.17% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.96% vs 3.57% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APTV	LULU
P/E ratio	41.27	7.89
Forward P/E	N/A	9.90
P/S ratio	0.49	0.98
P/B ratio	1.05	2.27
EV / EBITDA	7.72	4.64
FCF yield	8.32%	12.43%

Profitability

Metric	APTV	LULU
Gross margin	19.93%	56.11%
Operating margin	5.47%	17.76%
Net margin	1.17%	12.78%
ROE	2.51%	29.60%
ROIC	3.53%	20.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APTV	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.57%	14.96%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-35.51%	24.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.03%	-1.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-20.82%	-25.29%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, APTV or LULU?: LULU has the lower trailing P/E: APTV trades at 41.27 and LULU at 7.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, APTV or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — APTV at a 3.57% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.
Is APTV or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — APTV at 1.17% versus LULU at 12.78%.
How have APTV and LULU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, APTV delivered -1.31% and LULU delivered 4.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APTV analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Aptiv P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Aptiv ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Aptiv operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Aptiv revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Aptiv free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Aptiv & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.