Is APTV or LULU cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: APTV trades at a 39.10 P/E and LULU at 9.41.

Which has grown faster, APTV or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — APTV at a 9.13% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.

Is APTV or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — APTV at 1.77% versus LULU at 13.03%.

Which has been the better investment, APTV or LULU?

Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — APTV at 2.73% versus LULU at 5.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Aptiv PLC (APTV) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

LULU leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Aptiv PLC and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

APTV

Aptiv PLC

$13.90B

$65.68Consumer Cyclical

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.39B

$116.21Consumer Cyclical

Total return — APTV vs LULU

growth of $100 · last 15y

APTV +308.3%LULU +134.3%APTV compounded faster

APTV LULU

APTV vs LULU: by the numbers

•APTV is the larger company ($13.90B vs $13.39B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.41 vs 39.10 P/E).
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 1.77% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 9.13% CAGR).

Which is better, APTV or LULU?

Metric tally: APTV 3 · LULU 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLULU(lower P/E)

GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APTV	LULU
P/E ratio	39.10	9.41●
Forward P/E	—	10.52
P/S ratio	0.68●	1.20
P/B ratio	1.52●	2.78
PEG ratio	—	0.39
EV / EBITDA	9.33	5.39●
FCF yield	7.77%	9.54%●

Profitability

Metric	APTV	LULU
Gross margin	19.13%	55.70%●
Operating margin	5.53%	18.21%●
Net margin	1.77%	13.03%●
ROE	3.95%	30.25%●
ROIC	1.31%	22.70%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APTV	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.13%	17.61%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-35.51%	24.02%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.94%	7.36%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-15.71%●	-18.96%

Frequently asked

Which is better, APTV or LULU?: It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 11 to 3.
Is APTV or LULU cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: APTV trades at a 39.10 P/E and LULU at 9.41.
Which has grown faster, APTV or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — APTV at a 9.13% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
Is APTV or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — APTV at 1.77% versus LULU at 13.03%.
Which has been the better investment, APTV or LULU?: Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — APTV at 2.73% versus LULU at 5.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APTV analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Aptiv P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Aptiv dividend yield Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Aptiv ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Aptiv operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Aptiv revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Aptiv free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Aptiv & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.