Which has the lower trailing P/E, APPF or RMBS?

RMBS has the lower trailing P/E: APPF trades at 51.20 and RMBS at 38.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, APPF or RMBS?

Over the past five years, APPF grew revenue faster — APPF at a 26.26% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.

Is APPF or RMBS more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — APPF at 15.13% versus RMBS at 31.69%.

How have APPF and RMBS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, APPF delivered 28.38% and RMBS delivered 19.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AppFolio Inc. (APPF) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)

A side-by-side comparison of AppFolio Inc. and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

APPF

AppFolio Inc.

$7.99B

$223.57TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

RMBS

Rambus Inc.

$9.13B

$84.22TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT

Total return — APPF vs RMBS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

APPF +1115.6% (+28.4%/yr)RMBS +508.6% (+19.8%/yr)APPF compounded faster over this window

APPF RMBS

APPF vs RMBS: by the numbers

•RMBS is the larger company ($9.13B vs $7.99B market cap).
•RMBS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (38.86 vs 51.20 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 15.13% net margin).
•APPF grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.26% vs 22.51% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APPF	RMBS
P/E ratio	51.20	38.86
Forward P/E	32.50	27.91
P/S ratio	7.68	12.31
P/B ratio	15.19	6.35
EV / EBITDA	38.39	30.44
FCF yield	3.37%	3.22%

Profitability

Metric	APPF	RMBS
Gross margin	63.04%	78.27%
Operating margin	17.52%	35.51%
Net margin	15.13%	31.69%
ROE	29.94%	16.34%
ROIC	26.85%	14.56%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APPF	RMBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	26.26%	22.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.28%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	72.35%	14.08%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.01%	28.26%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, APPF or RMBS?: RMBS has the lower trailing P/E: APPF trades at 51.20 and RMBS at 38.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, APPF or RMBS?: Over the past five years, APPF grew revenue faster — APPF at a 26.26% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.
Is APPF or RMBS more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — APPF at 15.13% versus RMBS at 31.69%.
How have APPF and RMBS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, APPF delivered 28.38% and RMBS delivered 19.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APPF analysis Full RMBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AppFolio P/E ratio Rambus P/E ratio AppFolio ROE Rambus ROE AppFolio operating margin Rambus operating margin AppFolio revenue growth Rambus revenue growth AppFolio free cash flow Rambus free cash flow

AppFolio & Rambus appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.