AppLovin Corporation (APP) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
A side-by-side comparison of AppLovin Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: APP is classified in Technology; KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
APP
AppLovin Corporation
$418.22TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$113.09Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — APP vs KMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yAPP +533.0%KMB -4.5%APP compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
APP KMB
APP vs KMB: by the numbers
- •APP is the larger company ($140.50B vs $37.54B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.49 vs 35.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •APP converts more revenue to profit (64.29% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •APP grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.99% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays a dividend (4.56% yield), while APP has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APP | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.46 | 17.49 |
| Forward P/E | 25.66 | 14.81 |
| P/S ratio | 22.68 | 2.25 |
| P/B ratio | 59.15 | 20.67 |
| PEG ratio | 0.62 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.68 | 15.38 |
| FCF yield | 3.15% | 6.94% |
Profitability
| Metric | APP | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 88.37% | 35.86% |
| Operating margin | 77.09% | 13.27% |
| Net margin | 64.29% | 12.81% |
| ROE | 167.67% | 117.98% |
| ROIC | 60.71% | 17.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | APP | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.56% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 83.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APP | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 27.99% | -2.61% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.54% | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 79.57% | -8.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 45.80% | 0.34% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, APP or KMB?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: APP trades at 35.46 and KMB at 17.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, APP or KMB?
- Over the past five years, APP grew revenue faster — APP at a 27.99% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
- Does APP or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB pays a dividend (4.56% yield), while APP has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is APP or KMB more profitable?
- APP runs the higher net margin — APP at 64.29% versus KMB at 12.81%.
- How have APP and KMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, APP delivered 45.80% and KMB delivered 2.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
AppLovin P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioAppLovin dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldAppLovin ROEKimberly-Clark ROEAppLovin operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginAppLovin revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthAppLovin free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
AppLovin & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.