Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs U.S. Bancorp (USB)
USB leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
USB
U.S. Bancorp
$57.79Financial Services
Total return — APO vs USB
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +657.4%USB +116.6%APO compounded faster
APO USB
APO vs USB: by the numbers
- •USB is the larger company ($89.71B vs $79.41B market cap).
- •USB trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.14 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •USB converts more revenue to profit (18.02% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 12.25% CAGR).
- •USB pays the higher dividend yield (3.56% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, APO or USB?
Metric tally: APO 6 · USB 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUSB(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUSB(higher dividend yield)
QualityAPO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | USB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 12.14● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99 | 11.34● |
| P/S ratio | 2.68 | 2.07● |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | 1.37● |
| PEG ratio | 0.53 | 0.50● |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 62.81% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 23.18% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 18.02%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 11.87%● |
| ROIC | 7.24%● | 4.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 3.56%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 44.59% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 12.25% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 8.59% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 4.15% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or USB?
- It depends on your goal. value: USB (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: USB (higher dividend yield); quality: APO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, USB leads 8 to 6.
- Is APO or USB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, USB is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and USB at 12.14.
- Which has grown faster, APO or USB?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus USB at 12.25%.
- Does APO or USB pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and USB yields 3.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or USB more profitable?
- USB runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus USB at 18.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or USB?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus USB at 7.32%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioU.S. Bancorp P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldU.S. Bancorp dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEU.S. Bancorp ROEApollo Global Management operating marginU.S. Bancorp operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthU.S. Bancorp revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowU.S. Bancorp free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & U.S. Bancorp appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.