Is APO or MET cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MET is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and MET at 17.22.

Which has grown faster, APO or MET?

Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus MET at 3.40%.

Does APO or MET pay a bigger dividend?

APO yields 1.56% and MET yields 2.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is APO or MET more profitable?

APO runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus MET at 4.70%.

Which has been the better investment, APO or MET?

Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus MET at 12.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs MetLife, Inc. (MET)

APO leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics, though MET is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and MetLife, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

APO

Apollo Global Management, Inc.

$79.41B

$133.88Financial Services

MET

MetLife, Inc.

$56.94B

$88.84Financial Services

Total return — APO vs MET

growth of $100 · last 15y

APO +657.4%MET +121.3%APO compounded faster

APO MET

APO vs MET: by the numbers

•APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $56.94B market cap).
•MET trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.22 vs 40.08 P/E).
•APO converts more revenue to profit (7.24% vs 4.70% net margin).
•APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 3.40% CAGR).
•MET pays the higher dividend yield (2.58% vs 1.56%).

Which is better, APO or MET?

Metric tally: APO 7 · MET 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMET(lower P/E)

GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMET(higher dividend yield)

QualityAPO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APO	MET
P/E ratio	40.08	17.22●
Forward P/E	14.99	8.96●
P/S ratio	2.68	0.76●
P/B ratio	3.99	2.13●
PEG ratio	0.53	—

Profitability

Metric	APO	MET
Gross margin	89.33%●	28.40%
Operating margin	31.05%●	6.26%
Net margin	7.24%●	4.70%
ROE	10.78%	13.24%●
ROIC	7.24%●	0.72%

Dividends

Metric	APO	MET
Dividend yield	1.56%	2.58%●
Payout ratio	28.63%	47.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APO	MET
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	37.15%●	3.40%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	75.44%●	-3.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.35%●	10.06%

Frequently asked

Which is better, APO or MET?: It depends on your goal. value: MET (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MET (higher dividend yield); quality: APO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 7 to 6.
Is APO or MET cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MET is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and MET at 17.22.
Which has grown faster, APO or MET?: Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus MET at 3.40%.
Does APO or MET pay a bigger dividend?: APO yields 1.56% and MET yields 2.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is APO or MET more profitable?: APO runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus MET at 4.70%.
Which has been the better investment, APO or MET?: Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus MET at 12.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APO analysis Full MET analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Apollo Global Management P/E ratio MetLife P/E ratio Apollo Global Management dividend yield MetLife dividend yield Apollo Global Management ROE MetLife ROE Apollo Global Management operating margin MetLife operating margin Apollo Global Management revenue growth MetLife revenue growth Apollo Global Management free cash flow MetLife free cash flow

Apollo Global Management & MetLife appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.