Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE)
APO leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics, though ICE is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
$140.53Financial Services
Total return — APO vs ICE
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +635.6%ICE +462.3%APO compounded faster
APO ICE
APO vs ICE: by the numbers
- •ICE is the larger company ($79.47B vs $77.18B market cap).
- •ICE trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.46 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •ICE converts more revenue to profit (29.98% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 8.85% CAGR).
- •APO pays the higher dividend yield (1.56% vs 1.05%).
Which is better, APO or ICE?
Metric tally: APO 12 · ICE 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueICE(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAPO(higher dividend yield)
QualityAPO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | APO | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 20.46● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 15.96 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68● | 6.13 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | 2.71● |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 1.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.59● | 15.01 |
| FCF yield | 7.54%● | 5.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 68.98% |
| Operating margin | 31.05% | 40.84%● |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 29.98%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 13.26%● |
| ROIC | 7.24%● | 7.03% |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56%● | 1.05% |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 25.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 8.85% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 8.88% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 25.89%● | 11.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 20.73%● | 5.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or ICE?
- It depends on your goal. value: ICE (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: APO (higher dividend yield); quality: APO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 12 to 5.
- Is APO or ICE cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ICE is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and ICE at 20.46.
- Which has grown faster, APO or ICE?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus ICE at 8.85%.
- Does APO or ICE pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and ICE yields 1.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or ICE more profitable?
- ICE runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus ICE at 29.98%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or ICE?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 28.66% versus ICE at 11.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioIntercontinental Exchange P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldIntercontinental Exchange dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEIntercontinental Exchange ROEApollo Global Management operating marginIntercontinental Exchange operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthIntercontinental Exchange revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowIntercontinental Exchange free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Intercontinental Exchange appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.