Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT)
APO leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
$345.95Consumer Cyclical
Total return — APO vs HLT
growth of $100 · last 12yAPO +350.8%HLT +684.3%HLT compounded faster
APO HLT
APO vs HLT: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $78.75B market cap).
- •APO trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.08 vs 52.82 P/E).
- •HLT converts more revenue to profit (12.56% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 30.37% CAGR).
- •APO pays the higher dividend yield (1.56% vs 0.17%).
Which is better, APO or HLT?
Metric tally: APO 10 · HLT 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAPO(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAPO(higher dividend yield)
QualityHLT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08● | 52.82 |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 33.33 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68● | 6.54 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | — |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 4.27 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 30.86 |
| FCF yield | — | 2.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 44.29% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 23.08% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 12.56%● |
| ROE | 10.78%● | -27.04% |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 11.29%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56%● | 0.17% |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 9.71% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 30.37% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 12.36% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 45.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35% | 22.20%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or HLT?
- It depends on your goal. value: APO (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: APO (higher dividend yield); quality: HLT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 10 to 3.
- Is APO or HLT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, APO is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and HLT at 52.82.
- Which has grown faster, APO or HLT?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus HLT at 30.37%.
- Does APO or HLT pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and HLT yields 0.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or HLT more profitable?
- HLT runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus HLT at 12.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or HLT?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus HLT at 23.59%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioHilton Worldwide P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldHilton Worldwide dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEHilton Worldwide ROEApollo Global Management operating marginHilton Worldwide operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthHilton Worldwide revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowHilton Worldwide free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Hilton Worldwide appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.