Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS)
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: APO is classified in Financial Services; CRS is classified in Basic Materials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$128.98Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — APO vs CRS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yAPO +909.5% (+26.0%/yr)CRS +1295.2% (+30.2%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
APO CRS
APO vs CRS: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($74.29B vs $22.02B market cap).
- •APO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.85 vs 42.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (16.96% vs 5.22% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (43.10% vs 16.19% CAGR).
- •APO pays the higher dividend yield (1.68% vs 0.18%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.85 | 42.13 |
| Forward P/E | 14.71 | 33.23 |
| P/S ratio | 2.07 | 7.05 |
| P/B ratio | 3.54 | 9.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 26.28 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 1.65% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 95.50% | 30.58% |
| Operating margin | 24.13% | 22.47% |
| Net margin | 5.22% | 16.96% |
| ROE | 8.93% | 23.78% |
| ROIC | N/A | 17.08% |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.68% | 0.18% |
| Payout ratio | 47.99% | 7.60% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 43.10% | 16.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 66.21% | 178.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 19.37% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.36% | 71.94% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, APO or CRS?
- APO has the lower trailing P/E: APO trades at 28.85 and CRS at 42.13. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, APO or CRS?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 43.10% CAGR versus CRS at 16.19%.
- Does APO or CRS pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.68% and CRS yields 0.18% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or CRS more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — APO at 5.22% versus CRS at 16.96%.
- How have APO and CRS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, APO delivered 26.21% and CRS delivered 30.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioCarpenter Technology P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldCarpenter Technology dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROECarpenter Technology ROEApollo Global Management operating marginCarpenter Technology operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthCarpenter Technology revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Carpenter Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.