Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)
APO and BAM are evenly matched — 6 metrics each of 12.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$118.29Financial Services
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$44.62Financial Services
Total return — APO vs BAM
growth of $100 · last 4yAPO +70.9%BAM +39.4%APO compounded faster
APO BAM
APO vs BAM: by the numbers
- •BAM is the larger company ($71.25B vs $68.20B market cap).
- •BAM trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.97 vs 35.42 P/E).
- •BAM converts more revenue to profit (52.33% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 16.43% CAGR).
- •BAM pays the higher dividend yield (4.50% vs 1.90%).
Which is better, APO or BAM?
Metric tally: APO 6 · BAM 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBAM(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityBAM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.42 | 28.97● |
| Forward P/E | 13.25● | 25.20 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37● | 15.10 |
| P/B ratio | 3.53● | 9.49 |
| PEG ratio | 0.47● | 2.15 |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 71.84% |
| Operating margin | 31.05% | 63.13%● |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 52.33%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 32.88%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 14.45%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.90% | 4.50%● |
| Payout ratio | 30.78% | 130.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 16.43% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.29% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or BAM?
- It depends on your goal. value: BAM (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAM (higher dividend yield); quality: BAM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is APO or BAM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BAM is cheaper: APO trades at a 35.42 P/E and BAM at 28.97.
- Which has grown faster, APO or BAM?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus BAM at 16.43%.
- Does APO or BAM pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.90% and BAM yields 4.50% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or BAM more profitable?
- BAM runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus BAM at 52.33%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioBrookfield Asset Management P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldBrookfield Asset Management dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEBrookfield Asset Management ROEApollo Global Management operating marginBrookfield Asset Management operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthBrookfield Asset Management revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowBrookfield Asset Management free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Brookfield Asset Management appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.