Is APH or STX cheaper?

On trailing earnings, APH is cheaper: APH trades at a 44.20 P/E and STX at 88.33.

Which has grown faster, APH or STX?

Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 23.24% CAGR versus STX at 1.57%.

Does APH or STX pay a bigger dividend?

APH yields 0.54% and STX yields 0.31% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is APH or STX more profitable?

STX runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.28% versus STX at 21.60%.

Which has been the better investment, APH or STX?

Over the past 10-year, STX delivered the higher annualized total return — APH at 27.47% versus STX at 50.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX)

APH leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Amphenol Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Seagate Technology Holdings plc

$208.77B

$931.04Technology

Total return — APH vs STX

growth of $100 · last 24y

APH +11915.6%STX +7996.0%APH compounded faster

APH STX

APH vs STX: by the numbers

•STX is the larger company ($208.77B vs $189.21B market cap).
•APH trades at the lower earnings multiple (44.20 vs 88.33 P/E).
•STX converts more revenue to profit (21.60% vs 17.28% net margin).
•APH grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.24% vs 1.57% CAGR).
•APH pays the higher dividend yield (0.54% vs 0.31%).

Which is better, APH or STX?

Metric tally: APH 10 · STX 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAPH(lower P/E)

GrowthAPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeAPH(higher dividend yield)

QualitySTX(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	APH	STX
P/E ratio	44.20●	88.33
Forward P/E	32.36●	34.14
P/S ratio	7.66●	19.36
P/B ratio	14.19●	194.71
PEG ratio	0.52	0.06●
EV / EBITDA	26.77●	65.31
FCF yield	2.33%●	1.23%

Profitability

Metric	APH	STX
Gross margin	37.35%	41.54%●
Operating margin	26.00%	28.33%●
Net margin	17.28%	21.60%●
ROE	32.02%	217.17%●
ROIC	15.12%	34.14%●

Dividends

Metric	APH	STX
Dividend yield	0.54%●	0.31%
Payout ratio	23.65%	42.14%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APH	STX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	23.24%●	1.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.30%●	-0.47%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	30.28%●	20.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	36.28%	61.98%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, APH or STX?: It depends on your goal. value: APH (lower P/E); growth: APH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: APH (higher dividend yield); quality: STX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APH leads 10 to 7.
Is APH or STX cheaper?: On trailing earnings, APH is cheaper: APH trades at a 44.20 P/E and STX at 88.33.
Which has grown faster, APH or STX?: Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 23.24% CAGR versus STX at 1.57%.
Does APH or STX pay a bigger dividend?: APH yields 0.54% and STX yields 0.31% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is APH or STX more profitable?: STX runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.28% versus STX at 21.60%.
Which has been the better investment, APH or STX?: Over the past 10-year, STX delivered the higher annualized total return — APH at 27.47% versus STX at 50.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APH analysis Full STX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Amphenol P/E ratio Seagate Technology P/E ratio Amphenol dividend yield Seagate Technology dividend yield Amphenol ROE Seagate Technology ROE Amphenol operating margin Seagate Technology operating margin Amphenol revenue growth Seagate Technology revenue growth Amphenol free cash flow Seagate Technology free cash flow

Amphenol & Seagate Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.