Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW)
APH leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Amphenol Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APH
Amphenol Corporation
$153.80Technology
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
$279.62Technology
Total return — APH vs PANW
growth of $100 · last 14yAPH +2015.5%PANW +3059.5%PANW compounded faster
APH PANW
APH vs PANW: by the numbers
- •PANW is the larger company ($190.56B vs $189.21B market cap).
- •APH trades at the lower earnings multiple (44.20 vs 243.15 P/E).
- •APH converts more revenue to profit (17.28% vs 7.95% net margin).
- •APH grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.24% vs 21.62% CAGR).
- •APH pays a dividend (0.54% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.
Which is better, APH or PANW?
Metric tally: APH 12 · PANW 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAPH(lower P/E)
GrowthAPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAPH(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | APH | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.20● | 243.15 |
| Forward P/E | 32.36● | 68.62 |
| P/S ratio | 7.66● | 19.61 |
| P/B ratio | 14.19 | 7.52● |
| PEG ratio | 0.52● | 3.50 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.77● | 117.46 |
| FCF yield | 2.33%● | 2.06% |
Profitability
| Metric | APH | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.35% | 71.94%● |
| Operating margin | 26.00%● | 9.65% |
| Net margin | 17.28%● | 7.95% |
| ROE | 32.02%● | 3.05% |
| ROIC | 15.12%● | 5.67% |
Dividends
| Metric | APH | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | — |
| Payout ratio | 23.65% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APH | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 23.24%● | 21.62% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.30% | 69.46%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 30.28%● | 25.30% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 36.28% | 35.59% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APH or PANW?
- It depends on your goal. value: APH (lower P/E); growth: APH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: APH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APH leads 12 to 3.
- Is APH or PANW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, APH is cheaper: APH trades at a 44.20 P/E and PANW at 243.15.
- Which has grown faster, APH or PANW?
- Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 23.24% CAGR versus PANW at 21.62%.
- Does APH or PANW pay a bigger dividend?
- APH pays a dividend (0.54% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.
- Is APH or PANW more profitable?
- APH runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.28% versus PANW at 7.95%.
- Which has been the better investment, APH or PANW?
- Over the past 10-year, PANW delivered the higher annualized total return — APH at 27.47% versus PANW at 29.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Amphenol P/E ratioPalo Alto Networks P/E ratioAmphenol dividend yieldPalo Alto Networks dividend yieldAmphenol ROEPalo Alto Networks ROEAmphenol operating marginPalo Alto Networks operating marginAmphenol revenue growthPalo Alto Networks revenue growthAmphenol free cash flowPalo Alto Networks free cash flow
Amphenol & Palo Alto Networks appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.