Which has the lower trailing P/E, APH or PANW?

APH has the lower trailing P/E: APH trades at 37.58 and PANW at 273.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, APH or PANW?

Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 24.30% CAGR versus PANW at 21.62%.

Does APH or PANW pay a bigger dividend?

APH pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is APH or PANW more profitable?

APH runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.76% versus PANW at 7.95%.

How have APH and PANW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, APH delivered 27.20% and PANW delivered 30.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW)

A side-by-side comparison of Amphenol Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

APH

Amphenol Corporation

$192.44B

$156.43TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 12:45 PM EDT

PANW

Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

$261.11B

$320.39TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 12:45 PM EDT

Total return — APH vs PANW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14y

APH +2536.1%PANW +3449.7%PANW compounded faster

APH PANW

APH vs PANW: by the numbers

•PANW is the larger company ($261.11B vs $192.44B market cap).
•APH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (37.58 vs 273.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•APH converts more revenue to profit (17.76% vs 7.95% net margin).
•APH grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.30% vs 21.62% CAGR).
•APH pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APH	PANW
P/E ratio	37.58	273.17
Forward P/E	30.97	83.25
P/S ratio	6.68	22.04
P/B ratio	12.51	8.45
PEG ratio	0.52	3.93
EV / EBITDA	22.27	122.54
FCF yield	2.43%	1.84%

Profitability

Metric	APH	PANW
Gross margin	38.50%	71.94%
Operating margin	27.19%	9.65%
Net margin	17.76%	7.95%
ROE	33.27%	3.05%
ROIC	15.12%	5.67%

Dividends

Metric	APH	PANW
Dividend yield	0.61%	N/A
Payout ratio	26.07%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APH	PANW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.30%	21.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.30%	69.46%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	31.12%	25.30%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	34.32%	36.42%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, APH or PANW?: APH has the lower trailing P/E: APH trades at 37.58 and PANW at 273.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, APH or PANW?: Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 24.30% CAGR versus PANW at 21.62%.
Does APH or PANW pay a bigger dividend?: APH pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is APH or PANW more profitable?: APH runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.76% versus PANW at 7.95%.
How have APH and PANW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, APH delivered 27.20% and PANW delivered 30.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APH analysis Full PANW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Amphenol P/E ratio Palo Alto Networks P/E ratio Amphenol dividend yield Palo Alto Networks dividend yield Amphenol ROE Palo Alto Networks ROE Amphenol operating margin Palo Alto Networks operating margin Amphenol revenue growth Palo Alto Networks revenue growth Amphenol free cash flow Palo Alto Networks free cash flow

Amphenol & Palo Alto Networks appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.