Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL)
APH leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Amphenol Corporation and Marvell Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APH
Amphenol Corporation
$158.81Technology
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
$278.67Technology
Total return — APH vs MRVL
growth of $100 · last 26yAPH +8159.9%MRVL +1868.0%APH compounded faster
APH MRVL
APH vs MRVL: by the numbers
- •MRVL is the larger company ($243.78B vs $200.63B market cap).
- •APH trades at the lower earnings multiple (45.64 vs 95.81 P/E).
- •MRVL converts more revenue to profit (28.99% vs 17.28% net margin).
- •APH grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.24% vs 22.90% CAGR).
- •APH pays the higher dividend yield (0.42% vs 0.09%).
Which is better, APH or MRVL?
Metric tally: APH 12 · MRVL 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAPH(lower P/E)
QualityAPH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APH | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.64● | 95.81 |
| Forward P/E | 33.42● | 45.26 |
| P/S ratio | 7.91● | 28.56 |
| P/B ratio | 14.65 | 13.67● |
| PEG ratio | 0.52● | 21.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.59● | 54.21 |
| FCF yield | 2.26%● | 0.67% |
Profitability
| Metric | APH | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.35% | 50.64%● |
| Operating margin | 26.00%● | 16.20% |
| Net margin | 17.28% | 28.99%● |
| ROE | 32.02%● | 13.87% |
| ROIC | 15.12%● | 5.98% |
Dividends
| Metric | APH | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.42%● | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | 18.95% | 7.74% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APH | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 23.24% | 22.90% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.30%● | 4.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 30.28%● | 26.05% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 37.97% | 39.34%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APH or MRVL?
- It depends on your goal. value: APH (lower P/E); quality: APH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APH leads 12 to 4.
- Is APH or MRVL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, APH is cheaper: APH trades at a 45.64 P/E and MRVL at 95.81.
- Which has grown faster, APH or MRVL?
- Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 23.24% CAGR versus MRVL at 22.90%.
- Does APH or MRVL pay a bigger dividend?
- APH yields 0.42% and MRVL yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APH or MRVL more profitable?
- MRVL runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.28% versus MRVL at 28.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, APH or MRVL?
- Over the past 10-year, MRVL delivered the higher annualized total return — APH at 28.41% versus MRVL at 40.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Amphenol P/E ratioMarvell Technology P/E ratioAmphenol dividend yieldMarvell Technology dividend yieldAmphenol ROEMarvell Technology ROEAmphenol operating marginMarvell Technology operating marginAmphenol revenue growthMarvell Technology revenue growthAmphenol free cash flowMarvell Technology free cash flow
Amphenol & Marvell Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.