Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
IBM leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Amphenol Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APH
Amphenol Corporation
$158.81Technology
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
$270.81Technology
Total return — APH vs IBM
growth of $100 · last 30yAPH +41754.3%IBM +1006.3%APH compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
APH IBM
APH vs IBM: by the numbers
- •IBM is the larger company ($254.53B vs $200.63B market cap).
- •IBM trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.94 vs 45.64 P/E).
- •APH converts more revenue to profit (17.28% vs 15.61% net margin).
- •APH grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.24% vs -0.09% CAGR).
- •IBM pays the higher dividend yield (2.49% vs 0.42%).
Which is better, APH or IBM?
Metric tally: APH 7 · IBM 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueIBM(lower P/E)
GrowthAPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeIBM(higher dividend yield)
QualityAPH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APH | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.64 | 23.94● |
| Forward P/E | 33.42 | 20.22● |
| P/S ratio | 7.91 | 3.74● |
| P/B ratio | 14.65 | 7.82● |
| PEG ratio | 0.52 | 0.35● |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.59 | 17.97● |
| FCF yield | 2.26% | 5.08%● |
Profitability
| Metric | APH | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.35% | 58.97%● |
| Operating margin | 26.00%● | 16.36% |
| Net margin | 17.28%● | 15.61% |
| ROE | 32.02% | 32.61% |
| ROIC | 15.12%● | 8.57% |
Dividends
| Metric | APH | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 2.49%● |
| Payout ratio | 18.95% | 59.24% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APH | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 23.24%● | -0.09% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.30%● | 12.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 30.28%● | -3.35% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 37.97%● | 18.47% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APH or IBM?
- It depends on your goal. value: IBM (lower P/E); growth: APH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: IBM (higher dividend yield); quality: APH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IBM leads 9 to 7.
- Is APH or IBM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, IBM is cheaper: APH trades at a 45.64 P/E and IBM at 23.94.
- Which has grown faster, APH or IBM?
- Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 23.24% CAGR versus IBM at -0.09%.
- Does APH or IBM pay a bigger dividend?
- APH yields 0.42% and IBM yields 2.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APH or IBM more profitable?
- APH runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.28% versus IBM at 15.61%.
- Which has been the better investment, APH or IBM?
- Over the past 10-year, APH delivered the higher annualized total return — APH at 28.41% versus IBM at 11.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Amphenol P/E ratioInternational Business Machines P/E ratioAmphenol dividend yieldInternational Business Machines dividend yieldAmphenol ROEInternational Business Machines ROEAmphenol operating marginInternational Business Machines operating marginAmphenol revenue growthInternational Business Machines revenue growthAmphenol free cash flowInternational Business Machines free cash flow
Amphenol & International Business Machines appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.