StoneBridge Acquisition II Corporation (APAC) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
Over the past 5 years, APAC outperformed NMS — 0.74% vs -4.28% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of StoneBridge Acquisition II Corporation and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — APAC vs NMS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yMetrics side by side
Did APAC beat NMS?
Over the past 5 years, APAC outperformed NMS — 0.74% vs -4.28% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | APAC | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | N/A | -12.25% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | -2.47% | 7.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.74% | -4.28% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | N/A | -0.71% |
NMS is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has APAC beaten NMS?
- Over the past 5 years, APAC outperformed NMS — 0.74% vs -4.28% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.