Which has grown faster, AP or ESOA?

Over the past five years, ESOA grew revenue faster — AP at a 4.60% CAGR versus ESOA at 29.69%.

Does AP or ESOA pay a bigger dividend?

ESOA pays a dividend (1.18% yield), while AP is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is AP or ESOA more profitable?

ESOA runs the higher net margin — AP at -13.84% versus ESOA at 2.24%.

How have AP and ESOA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AP delivered -0.97% and ESOA delivered 25.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. (AP) vs Energy Services of America Corporation (ESOA)

A side-by-side comparison of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. and Energy Services of America Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.

$192M

$9.43IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:39 PM EDT

ESOA

Energy Services of America Corporation

$210M

$11.24IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

Total return — AP vs ESOA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AP -12.8% (-1.4%/yr)ESOA +848.6% (+25.2%/yr)ESOA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AP ESOA

AP vs ESOA: by the numbers

•ESOA is the larger company ($210M vs $192M market cap).
•ESOA is profitable (2.24% net margin) while AP runs a net loss (-13.84%).
•ESOA grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.69% vs 4.60% CAGR).
•ESOA pays a dividend (1.18% yield), while AP is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AP	ESOA
P/E ratio	N/A	18.66
Forward P/E	N/A	13.49
P/S ratio	0.45	0.45
P/B ratio	6.16	2.49
EV / EBITDA	11.30	7.61

Profitability

Metric	AP	ESOA
Gross margin	15.15%	11.77%
Operating margin	2.08%	3.87%
Net margin	-13.84%	2.24%
ROE	-190.42%	12.43%
ROIC	2.41%	9.26%

Dividends

Metric	AP	ESOA
Dividend yield	N/A	1.18%
Payout ratio	N/A	21.58%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AP	ESOA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.60%	29.69%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-31.40%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.90%	47.85%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AP or ESOA?: Over the past five years, ESOA grew revenue faster — AP at a 4.60% CAGR versus ESOA at 29.69%.
Does AP or ESOA pay a bigger dividend?: ESOA pays a dividend (1.18% yield), while AP is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is AP or ESOA more profitable?: ESOA runs the higher net margin — AP at -13.84% versus ESOA at 2.24%.
How have AP and ESOA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AP delivered -0.97% and ESOA delivered 25.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AP analysis Full ESOA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Energy Services of America P/E ratio Energy Services of America dividend yield Ampco-Pittsburgh ROE Energy Services of America ROE Ampco-Pittsburgh operating margin Energy Services of America operating margin Ampco-Pittsburgh revenue growth Energy Services of America revenue growth Ampco-Pittsburgh free cash flow Energy Services of America free cash flow

Ampco-Pittsburgh & Energy Services of America appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 5, 2026.