Which has grown faster, AP or BYRN?

Over the past five years, BYRN grew revenue faster — AP at a 6.21% CAGR versus BYRN at 36.74%.

Is AP or BYRN more profitable?

BYRN runs the higher net margin — AP at -15.53% versus BYRN at 7.30%.

Which has been the better investment, AP or BYRN?

Over the past 10-year, BYRN delivered the higher annualized total return — AP at -1.28% versus BYRN at 8.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. (AP) vs Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN)

BYRN leads on 7 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. and Byrna Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.

$207M

$9.82Industrials

BYRN

Byrna Technologies Inc.

$127M

$5.62Industrials

Total return — AP vs BYRN

growth of $100 · last 20y

AP -62.7%BYRN +87.3%BYRN compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AP BYRN

AP vs BYRN: by the numbers

•AP is the larger company ($207M vs $127M market cap).
•BYRN is profitable (7.30% net margin) while AP runs a net loss (-15.53%).
•BYRN grew revenue faster over the past five years (36.74% vs 6.21% CAGR).

Which is better, AP or BYRN?

Metric tally: AP 2 · BYRN 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBYRN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityBYRN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AP	BYRN
P/E ratio	—	15.49
P/S ratio	0.45●	1.11
P/B ratio	6.34	2.01●
EV / EBITDA	—	9.86

Profitability

Metric	AP	BYRN
Gross margin	14.54%	60.30%●
Operating margin	0.17%	9.43%●
Net margin	-15.53%	7.30%●
ROE	-217.33%	13.28%●
ROIC	1.59%	14.34%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AP	BYRN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.21%	36.74%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.91%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-46.19%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.62%●	-24.38%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AP or BYRN?: It depends on your goal. growth: BYRN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BYRN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BYRN leads 7 to 2.
Which has grown faster, AP or BYRN?: Over the past five years, BYRN grew revenue faster — AP at a 6.21% CAGR versus BYRN at 36.74%.
Is AP or BYRN more profitable?: BYRN runs the higher net margin — AP at -15.53% versus BYRN at 7.30%.
Which has been the better investment, AP or BYRN?: Over the past 10-year, BYRN delivered the higher annualized total return — AP at -1.28% versus BYRN at 8.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AP analysis Full BYRN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ampco-Pittsburgh P/E ratio Byrna Technologies P/E ratio Ampco-Pittsburgh dividend yield Byrna Technologies dividend yield Ampco-Pittsburgh ROE Byrna Technologies ROE Ampco-Pittsburgh operating margin Byrna Technologies operating margin Ampco-Pittsburgh revenue growth Byrna Technologies revenue growth Ampco-Pittsburgh free cash flow Byrna Technologies free cash flow

Ampco-Pittsburgh & Byrna Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.