A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)
AOS leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of A. O. Smith Corporation and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AOS
A. O. Smith Corporation
$62.72Industrials
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$246.33Industrials
Total return — AOS vs POWL
growth of $100 · last 30yAOS +2130.8%POWL +6091.9%POWL compounded faster
AOS POWL
AOS vs POWL: by the numbers
- •POWL is the larger company ($8.97B vs $8.76B market cap).
- •AOS trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.53 vs 51.76 P/E).
- •POWL converts more revenue to profit (16.51% vs 13.84% net margin).
- •POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 4.72% CAGR).
- •AOS pays the higher dividend yield (2.32% vs 0.14%).
Which is better, AOS or POWL?
Metric tally: AOS 9 · POWL 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAOS(lower P/E)
GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAOS(higher dividend yield)
QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AOS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.53● | 51.76 |
| Forward P/E | 16.42● | 40.33 |
| P/S ratio | 2.27● | 8.55 |
| P/B ratio | 4.61● | 13.65 |
| PEG ratio | 3.01 | 1.03● |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.47● | 39.44 |
| FCF yield | 7.49%● | 1.99% |
Profitability
| Metric | AOS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.77%● | 30.10% |
| Operating margin | 18.55% | 19.76%● |
| Net margin | 13.84% | 16.51%● |
| ROE | 28.10%● | 26.36% |
| ROIC | 23.94% | 25.41%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AOS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.32%● | 0.14% |
| Payout ratio | 37.31% | 7.21% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AOS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.72% | 19.84%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.52% | 59.98%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.27% | 34.56%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.80% | 96.95%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AOS or POWL?
- It depends on your goal. value: AOS (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AOS (higher dividend yield); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AOS leads 9 to 8.
- Is AOS or POWL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AOS is cheaper: AOS trades at a 16.53 P/E and POWL at 51.76.
- Which has grown faster, AOS or POWL?
- Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — AOS at a 4.72% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
- Does AOS or POWL pay a bigger dividend?
- AOS yields 2.32% and POWL yields 0.14% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AOS or POWL more profitable?
- POWL runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.84% versus POWL at 16.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, AOS or POWL?
- Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — AOS at 5.37% versus POWL at 43.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
A. O. Smith P/E ratioPowell Industries P/E ratioA. O. Smith dividend yieldPowell Industries dividend yieldA. O. Smith ROEPowell Industries ROEA. O. Smith operating marginPowell Industries operating marginA. O. Smith revenue growthPowell Industries revenue growthA. O. Smith free cash flowPowell Industries free cash flow
A. O. Smith & Powell Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.