A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs Fluor Corporation (FLR)
AOS leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of A. O. Smith Corporation and Fluor Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AOS vs FLR
growth of $100 · last 26yAOS +2072.6%FLR +295.3%AOS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AOS FLR
AOS vs FLR: by the numbers
- •AOS is the larger company ($8.41B vs $7.49B market cap).
- •AOS trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.01 vs 27.22 P/E).
- •AOS converts more revenue to profit (13.84% vs 2.30% net margin).
- •AOS grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.72% vs 1.92% CAGR).
- •AOS pays a dividend (2.36% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AOS or FLR?
Metric tally: AOS 8 · FLR 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAOS(lower P/E)
GrowthAOS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAOS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AOS | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.01● | 27.22 |
| Forward P/E | 15.92● | 20.67 |
| P/S ratio | 2.20 | 0.62● |
| P/B ratio | 4.46 | 3.29● |
| PEG ratio | 3.01 | 1.25● |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.13 | — |
| FCF yield | 7.73% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | AOS | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.77%● | -1.63% |
| Operating margin | 18.55%● | -3.40% |
| Net margin | 13.84%● | 2.30% |
| ROE | 28.10%● | 12.19% |
| ROIC | 23.94%● | 1.84% |
Dividends
| Metric | AOS | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.36% | — |
| Payout ratio | 36.79% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AOS | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.72%● | 1.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.52% | 40.81%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.27% | 6.28%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.55% | 23.65%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AOS or FLR?
- It depends on your goal. value: AOS (lower P/E); growth: AOS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AOS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AOS leads 8 to 6.
- Is AOS or FLR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AOS is cheaper: AOS trades at a 16.01 P/E and FLR at 27.22.
- Which has grown faster, AOS or FLR?
- Over the past five years, AOS grew revenue faster — AOS at a 4.72% CAGR versus FLR at 1.92%.
- Does AOS or FLR pay a bigger dividend?
- AOS pays a dividend (2.36% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
- Is AOS or FLR more profitable?
- AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.84% versus FLR at 2.30%.
- Which has been the better investment, AOS or FLR?
- Over the past 10-year, AOS delivered the higher annualized total return — AOS at 5.44% versus FLR at 1.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
A. O. Smith P/E ratioFluor P/E ratioA. O. Smith dividend yieldFluor dividend yieldA. O. Smith ROEFluor ROEA. O. Smith operating marginFluor operating marginA. O. Smith revenue growthFluor revenue growthA. O. Smith free cash flowFluor free cash flow
A. O. Smith & Fluor appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.