Which has the lower trailing P/E, AOS or DRS?

AOS has the lower trailing P/E: AOS trades at 17.57 and DRS at 33.92. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AOS or DRS?

Over the past five years, DRS grew revenue faster — AOS at a 3.37% CAGR versus DRS at 5.56%.

Does AOS or DRS pay a bigger dividend?

AOS yields 2.28% and DRS yields 0.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AOS or DRS more profitable?

AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.15% versus DRS at 8.52%.

How have AOS and DRS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AOS delivered 4.74% and DRS delivered 42.57% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS)

A side-by-side comparison of A. O. Smith Corporation and Leonardo DRS, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 24, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AOS

A. O. Smith Corporation

$8.74B

$63.08IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

DRS

Leonardo DRS, Inc.

$10.86B

$40.70IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — AOS vs DRS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AOS +57.0% (+4.6%/yr)DRS +3375.2% (+42.6%/yr)DRS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AOS DRS

AOS vs DRS: by the numbers

•DRS is the larger company ($10.86B vs $8.74B market cap).
•AOS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.57 vs 33.92 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AOS converts more revenue to profit (13.15% vs 8.52% net margin).
•DRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.56% vs 3.37% CAGR).
•AOS pays the higher dividend yield (2.28% vs 0.88%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AOS	DRS
P/E ratio	17.57	33.92
Forward P/E	16.89	29.49
P/S ratio	2.30	2.90
P/B ratio	4.74	3.90
EV / EBITDA	12.13	23.03
FCF yield	7.32%	3.32%

Profitability

Metric	AOS	DRS
Gross margin	38.59%	24.87%
Operating margin	17.57%	10.53%
Net margin	13.15%	8.52%
ROE	27.16%	11.49%
ROIC	18.44%	10.51%

Dividends

Metric	AOS	DRS
Dividend yield	2.28%	0.88%
Payout ratio	37.31%	34.29%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AOS	DRS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.37%	5.56%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.52%	13.00%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.38%	26.07%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.51%	30.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AOS or DRS?: AOS has the lower trailing P/E: AOS trades at 17.57 and DRS at 33.92. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AOS or DRS?: Over the past five years, DRS grew revenue faster — AOS at a 3.37% CAGR versus DRS at 5.56%.
Does AOS or DRS pay a bigger dividend?: AOS yields 2.28% and DRS yields 0.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AOS or DRS more profitable?: AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.15% versus DRS at 8.52%.
How have AOS and DRS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AOS delivered 4.74% and DRS delivered 42.57% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AOS analysis Full DRS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

A. O. Smith P/E ratio Leonardo DRS P/E ratio A. O. Smith dividend yield Leonardo DRS dividend yield A. O. Smith ROE Leonardo DRS ROE A. O. Smith operating margin Leonardo DRS operating margin A. O. Smith revenue growth Leonardo DRS revenue growth A. O. Smith free cash flow Leonardo DRS free cash flow

A. O. Smith & Leonardo DRS appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 24, 2026.