Which has grown faster, AOS or AVAV?

Over the past five years, AVAV grew revenue faster — AOS at a 4.72% CAGR versus AVAV at 32.50%.

Does AOS or AVAV pay a bigger dividend?

AOS pays a dividend (2.47% yield) while AVAV does not currently pay one.

Is AOS or AVAV more profitable?

AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.84% versus AVAV at -13.93%.

Which has been the better investment, AOS or AVAV?

Over the past 10-year, AVAV delivered the higher annualized total return — AOS at 4.60% versus AVAV at 17.29%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV)

AOS leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of A. O. Smith Corporation and AeroVironment, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AOS

A. O. Smith Corporation

Total return — AOS vs AVAV

growth of $100 · last 19y

AOS +798.9%AVAV +523.0%AOS compounded faster

AOS AVAV

AOS vs AVAV: by the numbers

•AOS is the larger company ($8.02B vs $7.44B market cap).
•AOS is profitable (13.84% net margin) while AVAV runs a net loss (-13.93%).
•AVAV grew revenue faster over the past five years (32.50% vs 4.72% CAGR).
•AOS pays a dividend (2.47% yield) while AVAV does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AOS or AVAV?

Metric tally: AOS 9 · AVAV 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthAVAV(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAOS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AOS	AVAV
P/E ratio	15.28	—
Forward P/E	15.20●	37.08
P/S ratio	2.10●	4.51
P/B ratio	4.26	1.70●
PEG ratio	3.01	—
EV / EBITDA	10.65●	40.90
FCF yield	8.10%	—

Profitability

Metric	AOS	AVAV
Gross margin	38.77%●	21.82%
Operating margin	18.55%●	-6.10%
Net margin	13.84%●	-13.93%
ROE	28.10%●	-5.25%
ROIC	23.94%●	4.17%

Dividends

Metric	AOS	AVAV
Dividend yield	2.47%	—
Payout ratio	36.79%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AOS	AVAV
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.72%	32.50%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.52%●	-2.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.27%	21.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.58%	6.01%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AOS or AVAV?: It depends on your goal. growth: AVAV (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AOS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AOS leads 9 to 4.
Which has grown faster, AOS or AVAV?: Over the past five years, AVAV grew revenue faster — AOS at a 4.72% CAGR versus AVAV at 32.50%.
Does AOS or AVAV pay a bigger dividend?: AOS pays a dividend (2.47% yield) while AVAV does not currently pay one.
Is AOS or AVAV more profitable?: AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.84% versus AVAV at -13.93%.
Which has been the better investment, AOS or AVAV?: Over the past 10-year, AVAV delivered the higher annualized total return — AOS at 4.60% versus AVAV at 17.29%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AOS analysis Full AVAV analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

A. O. Smith P/E ratio AeroVironment P/E ratio A. O. Smith dividend yield AeroVironment dividend yield A. O. Smith ROE AeroVironment ROE A. O. Smith operating margin AeroVironment operating margin A. O. Smith revenue growth AeroVironment revenue growth A. O. Smith free cash flow AeroVironment free cash flow

A. O. Smith & AeroVironment appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.