iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) vs Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD)
Over the past 10 years, NAD lagged AOA — 2.71% vs 9.97% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — AOA vs NAD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMetrics side by side
Did NAD beat AOA?
Over the past 10 years, NAD lagged AOA — 2.71% vs 9.97% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | AOA | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 17.84% | 11.23% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 17.57% | 9.95% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 8.94% | -0.65% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 9.97% | 2.71% |
AOA is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has NAD beaten AOA?
- Over the past 10 years, NAD lagged AOA — 2.71% vs 9.97% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 29, 2026.