iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) vs Strive, Inc. (ASST)
Over the past 3 years, ASST lagged AOA — -15.24% vs 17.88% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF and Strive, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — AOA vs ASST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yMetrics side by side
Did ASST beat AOA?
Over the past 3 years, ASST lagged AOA — -15.24% vs 17.88% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | AOA | ASST |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 12.41% | -40.04% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 17.88% | -15.24% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.13% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 9.69% | N/A |
AOA is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has ASST beaten AOA?
- Over the past 3 years, ASST lagged AOA — -15.24% vs 17.88% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.