Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited (ANPA) vs Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC)

A side-by-side comparison of Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited and Quest Resource Holding Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ANPA vs QRHC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
ANPA -42.6% (-42.6%/yr)QRHC -29.3% (-29.3%/yr)QRHC compounded faster over this window
01k2k3k4kStart $1002026$57$71
ANPA QRHC

ANPA vs QRHC: by the numbers

  • •ANPA is the larger company ($29M vs $29M market cap).
  • •ANPA is profitable (2.13% net margin) while QRHC runs a net loss (-7.07%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricANPAQRHC
P/S ratioN/A0.12
P/B ratio46.221.07
FCF yieldN/A36.48%

Profitability

MetricANPAQRHC
Gross margin46.18%15.52%
Operating margin1.55%-3.37%
Net margin2.13%-7.07%
ROE2.35%-65.48%
ROIC1.16%-9.25%

Growth (annualized)

MetricANPAQRHC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A15.00%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A10.49%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-26.17%

Frequently asked

Is ANPA or QRHC more profitable?
ANPA runs the higher net margin — ANPA at 2.13% versus QRHC at -7.07%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.