Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited (ANPA) vs CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV)

A side-by-side comparison of Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited and CVD Equipment Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ANPA vs CVV

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
ANPA -42.6% (-42.6%/yr)CVV +24.1% (+24.1%/yr)CVV compounded faster over this window
01k2k3k4kStart $1002026$57$124
ANPA CVV

ANPA vs CVV: by the numbers

  • •CVV is the larger company ($30M vs $29M market cap).
  • •CVV converts more revenue to profit (62.01% vs 2.13% net margin).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricANPACVV
P/E ratioN/A3.01
P/S ratioN/A1.86
P/B ratio46.240.83
FCF yieldN/A1.54%

Profitability

MetricANPACVV
Gross margin46.18%24.73%
Operating margin1.55%-6.77%
Net margin2.13%62.01%
ROE2.35%27.79%
ROIC1.16%-11.85%

Growth (annualized)

MetricANPACVV
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A2.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-1.26%

Frequently asked

Is ANPA or CVV more profitable?
CVV runs the higher net margin — ANPA at 2.13% versus CVV at 62.01%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.