AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) vs 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. (FDMT)

A side-by-side comparison of AngioDynamics, Inc. and 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ANGO vs FDMT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
ANGO +5.6% (+0.9%/yr)FDMT -68.1% (-17.3%/yr)ANGO compounded faster over this window
050100150200Start $100202120222023202420252026$106$32
ANGO FDMT

ANGO vs FDMT: by the numbers

  • •FDMT is the larger company ($676M vs $613M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; ANGO's is the smaller (-11.48% vs -194.74% net margin).
  • •FDMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.93% vs 1.93% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricANGOFDMT
P/S ratio1.917.35
P/B ratio3.591.66
FCF yield0.08%N/A

Profitability

MetricANGOFDMT
Gross margin54.62%91.05%
Operating margin-12.47%-187.24%
Net margin-11.48%-194.74%
ROE-21.51%-43.95%
ROIC-20.75%-44.30%

Growth (annualized)

MetricANGOFDMT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)1.93%31.93%
FCF CAGR (5Y)-51.49%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)-10.80%-13.08%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ANGO or FDMT?
Over the past five years, FDMT grew revenue faster — ANGO at a 1.93% CAGR versus FDMT at 31.93%.
How have ANGO and FDMT total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, ANGO delivered -10.80% and FDMT delivered -13.08% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.