Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB)
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$141.39Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RUSHB
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
$56.54Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ANF vs RUSHB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yANF +952.9% (+26.5%/yr)RUSHB +773.1% (+24.2%/yr)ANF compounded faster over this window
ANF RUSHB
ANF vs RUSHB: by the numbers
- •RUSHB is the larger company ($6.73B vs $6.28B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.11 vs 17.03 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ANF converts more revenue to profit (10.04% vs 3.67% net margin).
- •ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.28% vs 7.70% CAGR).
- •RUSHB pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | RUSHB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.11 | 17.03 |
| Forward P/E | 10.98 | 22.93 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.65 |
| P/S ratio | 1.18 | 0.93 |
| P/B ratio | 4.64 | 2.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.76 | 14.80 |
| FCF yield | 9.02% | 1.86% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | RUSHB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 62.88% | 18.98% |
| Operating margin | 13.66% | 5.13% |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 3.67% |
| ROE | 39.57% | 11.38% |
| ROIC | 20.97% | 7.17% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANF | RUSHB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 15.66% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | RUSHB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.28% | 7.70% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 19.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.77% | -22.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 29.27% | 23.68% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or RUSHB?
- ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.11 and RUSHB at 17.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or RUSHB?
- Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus RUSHB at 7.70%.
- Does ANF or RUSHB pay a bigger dividend?
- RUSHB pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is ANF or RUSHB more profitable?
- ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus RUSHB at 3.67%.
- How have ANF and RUSHB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 26.29% and RUSHB delivered 24.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioRush Enterprises P/E ratioRush Enterprises dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROERush Enterprises ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginRush Enterprises operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthRush Enterprises revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowRush Enterprises free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & Rush Enterprises appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.