Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 9.53 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ANF or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Is ANF or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus NA at 505.49%.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: ANF is classified in Consumer Cyclical; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

ANF

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

$4.58B

$103.16Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ANF vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

ANF +477.3%NA -98.4%ANF compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ANF NA

ANF vs NA: by the numbers

•ANF is the larger company ($4.58B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 9.53 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 9.34% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 9.07% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ANF	NA
P/E ratio	9.53	2.30
Forward P/E	10.10	N/A
P/S ratio	0.86	11.40
P/B ratio	3.39	0.41
PEG ratio	0.16	N/A
EV / EBITDA	6.22	6.44
FCF yield	9.17%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	ANF	NA
Gross margin	60.86%	-147.33%
Operating margin	12.94%	-396.84%
Net margin	9.34%	505.49%
ROE	36.84%	17.96%
ROIC	18.66%	-10.96%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ANF	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.07%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	61.20%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.11%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.77%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 9.53 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ANF or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Is ANF or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full ANF analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio Abercrombie & Fitch dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield Abercrombie & Fitch ROE Nano Labs ROE Abercrombie & Fitch operating margin Nano Labs operating margin Abercrombie & Fitch revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth Abercrombie & Fitch free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

Abercrombie & Fitch & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.