Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN)
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Vail Resorts, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$149.67Consumer CyclicalAt close: Sep 4, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
$134.96Consumer CyclicalAt close: Sep 4, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — ANF vs MTN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yANF +919.3% (+26.1%/yr)MTN +14.1% (+1.3%/yr)ANF compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ANF MTN
ANF vs MTN: by the numbers
- •ANF is the larger company ($6.65B vs $4.81B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.81 vs 31.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ANF converts more revenue to profit (10.04% vs 6.29% net margin).
- •MTN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.70% vs 8.28% CAGR).
- •MTN pays a dividend (6.58% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.81 | 31.17 |
| Forward P/E | 15.21 | 31.24 |
| P/S ratio | 1.23 | 1.71 |
| P/B ratio | 4.87 | 8.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.11 | 7.85 |
| FCF yield | 8.59% | 4.90% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 62.88% | 42.78% |
| Operating margin | 13.66% | 24.13% |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 6.29% |
| ROE | 39.57% | 32.27% |
| ROIC | 20.97% | 9.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANF | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 6.58% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 117.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.28% | 9.70% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 61.20% | 25.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.77% | 7.51% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 33.88% | -10.55% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or MTN?
- ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.81 and MTN at 31.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or MTN?
- Over the past five years, MTN grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus MTN at 9.70%.
- Does ANF or MTN pay a bigger dividend?
- MTN pays a dividend (6.58% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is ANF or MTN more profitable?
- ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus MTN at 6.29%.
- How have ANF and MTN total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 26.43% and MTN delivered 1.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioVail Resorts P/E ratioVail Resorts dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROEVail Resorts ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginVail Resorts operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthVail Resorts revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowVail Resorts free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & Vail Resorts appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 5, 2026.