Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN)
ANF leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Vail Resorts, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 22, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$96.04Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
$144.93Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ANF vs MTN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29yANF +1919.2%MTN +872.5%ANF compounded faster
ANF MTN
ANF vs MTN: by the numbers
- •MTN is the larger company ($5.16B vs $4.27B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.83 vs 34.04 P/E).
- •ANF converts more revenue to profit (9.34% vs 6.29% net margin).
- •MTN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.70% vs 9.07% CAGR).
- •MTN pays a dividend (6.02% yield) while ANF does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ANF or MTN?
Metric tally: ANF 13 · MTN 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueANF(lower P/E)
GrowthMTN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityANF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.83● | 34.04 |
| Forward P/E | 9.35● | 34.07 |
| P/S ratio | 0.80● | 1.87 |
| P/B ratio | 3.14● | 9.59 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14● | 0.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.82● | 8.30 |
| FCF yield | 9.89%● | 4.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.86%● | 42.78% |
| Operating margin | 12.94% | 24.13%● |
| Net margin | 9.34%● | 6.29% |
| ROE | 36.84%● | 32.27% |
| ROIC | 18.66%● | 8.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANF | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 6.02% |
| Payout ratio | — | 117.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.07% | 9.70%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 61.20%● | 25.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.11% | 7.51%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.83%● | -10.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ANF or MTN?
- It depends on your goal. value: ANF (lower P/E); growth: MTN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ANF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ANF leads 13 to 3.
- Is ANF or MTN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ANF is cheaper: ANF trades at a 8.83 P/E and MTN at 34.04.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or MTN?
- Over the past five years, MTN grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus MTN at 9.70%.
- Does ANF or MTN pay a bigger dividend?
- MTN pays a dividend (6.02% yield) while ANF does not currently pay one.
- Is ANF or MTN more profitable?
- ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus MTN at 6.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, ANF or MTN?
- Over the past 10-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — ANF at 18.49% versus MTN at 3.20%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioVail Resorts P/E ratioAbercrombie & Fitch dividend yieldVail Resorts dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROEVail Resorts ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginVail Resorts operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthVail Resorts revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowVail Resorts free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & Vail Resorts appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 22, 2026.