Is ANF or MHK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ANF is cheaper: ANF trades at a 8.69 P/E and MHK at 16.14.

Which has grown faster, ANF or MHK?

Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.

Is ANF or MHK more profitable?

ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus MHK at 3.77%.

Which has been the better investment, ANF or MHK?

Over the past 10-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — ANF at 19.21% versus MHK at -5.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)

ANF leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ANF

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

$4.02B

$90.57Consumer Cyclical

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$6.56B

$107.64Consumer Cyclical

Not enough overlapping price history to compare ANF and MHK.

ANF vs MHK: by the numbers

•MHK is the larger company ($6.56B vs $4.02B market cap).
•ANF trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.69 vs 16.14 P/E).
•ANF converts more revenue to profit (9.34% vs 3.77% net margin).
•ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs 2.03% CAGR).

Which is better, ANF or MHK?

Metric tally: ANF 11 · MHK 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueANF(lower P/E)

GrowthANF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityANF(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	ANF	MHK
P/E ratio	8.69●	16.14
Forward P/E	9.20●	12.54
P/S ratio	0.78	0.60●
P/B ratio	3.09	0.79●
PEG ratio	0.14	—
EV / EBITDA	5.57	5.54
FCF yield	10.06%	10.68%●

Profitability

Metric	ANF	MHK
Gross margin	60.86%●	24.34%
Operating margin	12.94%●	4.89%
Net margin	9.34%●	3.77%
ROE	36.84%●	4.95%
ROIC	18.66%●	3.54%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ANF	MHK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.07%●	2.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	61.20%●	-3.82%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.11%●	-12.83%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.00%●	-11.03%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ANF or MHK?: It depends on your goal. value: ANF (lower P/E); growth: ANF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ANF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ANF leads 11 to 3.
Is ANF or MHK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ANF is cheaper: ANF trades at a 8.69 P/E and MHK at 16.14.
Which has grown faster, ANF or MHK?: Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.
Is ANF or MHK more profitable?: ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus MHK at 3.77%.
Which has been the better investment, ANF or MHK?: Over the past 10-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — ANF at 19.21% versus MHK at -5.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ANF analysis Full MHK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratio Mohawk Industries P/E ratio Abercrombie & Fitch dividend yield Mohawk Industries dividend yield Abercrombie & Fitch ROE Mohawk Industries ROE Abercrombie & Fitch operating margin Mohawk Industries operating margin Abercrombie & Fitch revenue growth Mohawk Industries revenue growth Abercrombie & Fitch free cash flow Mohawk Industries free cash flow

Abercrombie & Fitch & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.