Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or MHK?

ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.43 and MHK at 16.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ANF or MHK?

Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus MHK at 0.62%.

Is ANF or MHK more profitable?

ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus MHK at 4.15%.

How have ANF and MHK total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 25.69% and MHK delivered -4.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)

A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ANF

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

$6.45B

$145.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$7.73B

$126.79Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ANF vs MHK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ANF +873.4% (+25.6%/yr)MHK -42.2% (-5.3%/yr)ANF compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ANF MHK

ANF vs MHK: by the numbers

•MHK is the larger company ($7.73B vs $6.45B market cap).
•ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.43 vs 16.79 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ANF converts more revenue to profit (10.04% vs 4.15% net margin).
•ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.28% vs 0.62% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ANF	MHK
P/E ratio	12.43	16.79
Forward P/E	11.27	12.88
P/S ratio	1.21	0.69
P/B ratio	4.76	0.90
EV / EBITDA	7.95	7.16
FCF yield	8.78%	10.50%

Profitability

Metric	ANF	MHK
Gross margin	62.88%	24.65%
Operating margin	13.66%	5.39%
Net margin	10.04%	4.15%
ROE	39.57%	5.43%
ROIC	20.97%	4.46%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ANF	MHK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.28%	0.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	61.20%	-3.82%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.77%	-6.69%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	32.24%	-7.91%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or MHK?: ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.43 and MHK at 16.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ANF or MHK?: Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus MHK at 0.62%.
Is ANF or MHK more profitable?: ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus MHK at 4.15%.
How have ANF and MHK total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 25.69% and MHK delivered -4.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ANF analysis Full MHK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratio Mohawk Industries P/E ratio Abercrombie & Fitch ROE Mohawk Industries ROE Abercrombie & Fitch operating margin Mohawk Industries operating margin Abercrombie & Fitch revenue growth Mohawk Industries revenue growth Abercrombie & Fitch free cash flow Mohawk Industries free cash flow

Abercrombie & Fitch & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.