Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$102.10Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
$114.10Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT
Total return — ANF vs MHK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yANF +1245.4%MHK +602.8%ANF compounded faster
ANF MHK
ANF vs MHK: by the numbers
- •MHK is the larger company ($6.95B vs $4.54B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.90 vs 17.56 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ANF converts more revenue to profit (9.34% vs 3.77% net margin).
- •ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs 2.03% CAGR).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | MHK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.90 | 17.56 |
| Forward P/E | 10.48 | 13.66 |
| P/S ratio | 0.89 | 0.66 |
| P/B ratio | 3.52 | 0.86 |
| PEG ratio | 0.16 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.42 | 7.27 |
| FCF yield | 8.83% | 9.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | MHK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.86% | 24.34% |
| Operating margin | 12.94% | 4.89% |
| Net margin | 9.34% | 3.77% |
| ROE | 36.84% | 4.95% |
| ROIC | 18.66% | 3.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | MHK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.07% | 2.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 61.20% | -3.82% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.11% | -12.83% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 22.23% | -9.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or MHK?
- ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 9.90 and MHK at 17.56. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or MHK?
- Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.
- Is ANF or MHK more profitable?
- ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus MHK at 3.77%.
- How have ANF and MHK total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 19.74% and MHK delivered -5.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioMohawk Industries P/E ratioAbercrombie & Fitch dividend yieldMohawk Industries dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROEMohawk Industries ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginMohawk Industries operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthMohawk Industries revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowMohawk Industries free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.