Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or LYFT?

LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 9.53 and LYFT at 2.20. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ANF or LYFT?

Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus LYFT at 26.43%.

Is ANF or LYFT more profitable?

LYFT runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus LYFT at 43.82%.

How have ANF and LYFT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ANF delivered 19.15% and LYFT delivered -22.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)

A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Lyft, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: ANF is classified in Consumer Cyclical; LYFT is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

ANF

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

$4.58B

$103.16Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LYFT

Lyft, Inc.

$5.87B

$15.45TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ANF vs LYFT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

ANF +311.6%LYFT -80.7%ANF compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ANF LYFT

ANF vs LYFT: by the numbers

•LYFT is the larger company ($5.87B vs $4.58B market cap).
•LYFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.20 vs 9.53 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LYFT converts more revenue to profit (43.82% vs 9.34% net margin).
•LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.43% vs 9.07% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ANF	LYFT
P/E ratio	9.53	2.20
Forward P/E	10.10	25.64
P/S ratio	0.86	0.93
P/B ratio	3.39	2.01
PEG ratio	0.16	N/A
EV / EBITDA	6.22	N/A
FCF yield	9.17%	19.01%

Profitability

Metric	ANF	LYFT
Gross margin	60.86%	43.24%
Operating margin	12.94%	-2.53%
Net margin	9.34%	43.82%
ROE	36.84%	94.37%
ROIC	18.66%	217.84%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ANF	LYFT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.07%	26.43%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	61.20%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.11%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.77%	-22.81%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or LYFT?: LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 9.53 and LYFT at 2.20. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ANF or LYFT?: Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus LYFT at 26.43%.
Is ANF or LYFT more profitable?: LYFT runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus LYFT at 43.82%.
How have ANF and LYFT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ANF delivered 19.15% and LYFT delivered -22.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ANF analysis Full LYFT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratio Lyft P/E ratio Abercrombie & Fitch dividend yield Lyft dividend yield Abercrombie & Fitch ROE Lyft ROE Abercrombie & Fitch operating margin Lyft operating margin Abercrombie & Fitch revenue growth Lyft revenue growth Abercrombie & Fitch free cash flow Lyft free cash flow

Abercrombie & Fitch & Lyft appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.