Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or LQDT?

ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 9.84 and LQDT at 41.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ANF or LQDT?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.

Is ANF or LQDT more profitable?

ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus LQDT at 6.30%.

How have ANF and LQDT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 19.51% and LQDT delivered 16.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)

A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ANF

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

$4.55B

$102.49Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.20B

$38.45Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ANF vs LQDT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 20y

ANF +121.0%LQDT +212.9%LQDT compounded faster

ANF LQDT

ANF vs LQDT: by the numbers

•ANF is the larger company ($4.55B vs $1.20B market cap).
•ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.84 vs 41.34 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ANF converts more revenue to profit (9.34% vs 6.30% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs 9.07% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ANF	LQDT
P/E ratio	9.84	41.34
Forward P/E	10.41	25.55
P/S ratio	0.89	2.59
P/B ratio	3.49	5.59
PEG ratio	0.16	0.80
EV / EBITDA	6.39	20.92
FCF yield	8.89%	6.26%

Profitability

Metric	ANF	LQDT
Gross margin	60.86%	45.61%
Operating margin	12.94%	8.37%
Net margin	9.34%	6.30%
ROE	36.84%	13.62%
ROIC	18.66%	11.42%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ANF	LQDT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.07%	16.76%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	61.20%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.11%	6.73%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.72%	13.96%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or LQDT?: ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 9.84 and LQDT at 41.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ANF or LQDT?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.
Is ANF or LQDT more profitable?: ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus LQDT at 6.30%.
How have ANF and LQDT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 19.51% and LQDT delivered 16.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ANF analysis Full LQDT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratio Liquidity Services P/E ratio Abercrombie & Fitch dividend yield Liquidity Services dividend yield Abercrombie & Fitch ROE Liquidity Services ROE Abercrombie & Fitch operating margin Liquidity Services operating margin Abercrombie & Fitch revenue growth Liquidity Services revenue growth Abercrombie & Fitch free cash flow Liquidity Services free cash flow

Abercrombie & Fitch & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.