Is ANF or LQDT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ANF is cheaper: ANF trades at a 8.69 P/E and LQDT at 40.80.

Which has grown faster, ANF or LQDT?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.

Is ANF or LQDT more profitable?

ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus LQDT at 6.30%.

Which has been the better investment, ANF or LQDT?

Over the past 10-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — ANF at 19.21% versus LQDT at 18.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)

ANF leads on 15 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ANF

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

$4.02B

$90.57Consumer Cyclical

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.18B

$37.94Consumer Cyclical

Total return — ANF vs LQDT

growth of $100 · last 20y

ANF +37.6%LQDT +208.7%LQDT compounded faster

ANF LQDT

ANF vs LQDT: by the numbers

•ANF is the larger company ($4.02B vs $1.18B market cap).
•ANF trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.69 vs 40.80 P/E).
•ANF converts more revenue to profit (9.34% vs 6.30% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs 9.07% CAGR).

Which is better, ANF or LQDT?

Metric tally: ANF 15 · LQDT 1

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueANF(lower P/E)

GrowthLQDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityANF(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	ANF	LQDT
P/E ratio	8.69●	40.80
Forward P/E	9.20●	25.21
P/S ratio	0.78●	2.55
P/B ratio	3.09●	5.52
PEG ratio	0.14●	0.80
EV / EBITDA	5.57●	18.90
FCF yield	10.06%●	6.35%

Profitability

Metric	ANF	LQDT
Gross margin	60.86%●	45.61%
Operating margin	12.94%●	8.37%
Net margin	9.34%●	6.30%
ROE	36.84%●	13.62%
ROIC	18.66%●	11.42%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ANF	LQDT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.07%	16.76%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	61.20%●	-0.58%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.11%●	6.73%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.00%●	10.63%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ANF or LQDT?: It depends on your goal. value: ANF (lower P/E); growth: LQDT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ANF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ANF leads 15 to 1.
Is ANF or LQDT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ANF is cheaper: ANF trades at a 8.69 P/E and LQDT at 40.80.
Which has grown faster, ANF or LQDT?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.
Is ANF or LQDT more profitable?: ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus LQDT at 6.30%.
Which has been the better investment, ANF or LQDT?: Over the past 10-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — ANF at 19.21% versus LQDT at 18.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ANF analysis Full LQDT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratio Liquidity Services P/E ratio Abercrombie & Fitch dividend yield Liquidity Services dividend yield Abercrombie & Fitch ROE Liquidity Services ROE Abercrombie & Fitch operating margin Liquidity Services operating margin Abercrombie & Fitch revenue growth Liquidity Services revenue growth Abercrombie & Fitch free cash flow Liquidity Services free cash flow

Abercrombie & Fitch & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.