Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs LKQ Corporation (LKQ)
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and LKQ Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$145.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
$24.11Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ANF vs LKQ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yANF +873.4% (+25.6%/yr)LKQ -22.7% (-2.5%/yr)ANF compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ANF LKQ
ANF vs LKQ: by the numbers
- •ANF is the larger company ($6.45B vs $6.10B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.43 vs 13.39 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ANF converts more revenue to profit (10.04% vs 3.37% net margin).
- •ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.28% vs 1.66% CAGR).
- •LKQ pays a dividend (5.08% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.43 | 13.39 |
| Forward P/E | 11.27 | 8.98 |
| P/S ratio | 1.21 | 0.45 |
| P/B ratio | 4.76 | 0.95 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.95 | 8.41 |
| FCF yield | 8.78% | 10.25% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 62.88% | 37.66% |
| Operating margin | 13.66% | 6.79% |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 3.37% |
| ROE | 39.57% | 7.15% |
| ROIC | 20.97% | 5.62% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANF | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 5.08% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 66.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.28% | 1.66% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 61.20% | 2.28% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.77% | -13.37% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 32.24% | -11.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or LKQ?
- ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.43 and LKQ at 13.39. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or LKQ?
- Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus LKQ at 1.66%.
- Does ANF or LKQ pay a bigger dividend?
- LKQ pays a dividend (5.08% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is ANF or LKQ more profitable?
- ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus LKQ at 3.37%.
- How have ANF and LKQ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 25.69% and LKQ delivered -2.47% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioLKQ P/E ratioLKQ dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROELKQ ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginLKQ operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthLKQ revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowLKQ free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & LKQ appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.