Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or KMX?

ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.96 and KMX at 37.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ANF or KMX?

Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus KMX at 2.39%.

Is ANF or KMX more profitable?

ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus KMX at 0.84%.

How have ANF and KMX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 26.42% and KMX delivered 0.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs CarMax, Inc. (KMX)

A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and CarMax, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 9, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ANF

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

$6.83B

$153.64Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 10:20 AM EDT

KMX

CarMax, Inc.

$8.55B

$60.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 10:20 AM EDT

Total return — ANF vs KMX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ANF +931.3% (+26.3%/yr)KMX +0.8% (+0.1%/yr)ANF compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ANF KMX

ANF vs KMX: by the numbers

•KMX is the larger company ($8.55B vs $6.83B market cap).
•ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.96 vs 37.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ANF converts more revenue to profit (10.04% vs 0.84% net margin).
•ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.28% vs 2.39% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ANF	KMX
P/E ratio	12.96	37.62
Forward P/E	15.39	22.48
P/S ratio	1.25	0.33
P/B ratio	4.92	1.41
EV / EBITDA	8.20	N/A
FCF yield	8.49%	11.55%

Profitability

Metric	ANF	KMX
Gross margin	62.88%	10.24%
Operating margin	13.66%	-1.85%
Net margin	10.04%	0.84%
ROE	39.57%	3.64%
ROIC	20.97%	-1.21%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ANF	KMX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.28%	2.39%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	61.20%	-18.18%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.77%	13.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	34.92%	-14.35%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or KMX?: ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.96 and KMX at 37.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ANF or KMX?: Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus KMX at 2.39%.
Is ANF or KMX more profitable?: ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus KMX at 0.84%.
How have ANF and KMX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 26.42% and KMX delivered 0.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ANF analysis Full KMX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratio CarMax P/E ratio Abercrombie & Fitch ROE CarMax ROE Abercrombie & Fitch operating margin CarMax operating margin Abercrombie & Fitch revenue growth CarMax revenue growth Abercrombie & Fitch free cash flow CarMax free cash flow

Abercrombie & Fitch & CarMax appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 9, 2026.