Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: ANF is classified in Consumer Cyclical; EPAC is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$103.16Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ANF vs EPAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yANF +1195.7%EPAC +2637.9%EPAC compounded faster
ANF EPAC
ANF vs EPAC: by the numbers
- •ANF is the larger company ($4.58B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.53 vs 19.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 9.34% net margin).
- •ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.53 | 19.71 |
| Forward P/E | 10.10 | 18.70 |
| P/S ratio | 0.86 | 2.84 |
| P/B ratio | 3.39 | 4.24 |
| PEG ratio | 0.16 | 2.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.22 | 11.97 |
| FCF yield | 9.17% | 6.24% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.86% | 49.05% |
| Operating margin | 12.94% | 21.76% |
| Net margin | 9.34% | 14.72% |
| ROE | 36.84% | 22.01% |
| ROIC | 18.66% | 15.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANF | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 2.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.07% | 5.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 61.20% | 169.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.11% | 34.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 20.77% | 6.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or EPAC?
- ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 9.53 and EPAC at 19.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or EPAC?
- Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus EPAC at 5.10%.
- Does ANF or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is ANF or EPAC more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus EPAC at 14.72%.
- How have ANF and EPAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 19.15% and EPAC delivered 3.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioEnerpac Tool P/E ratioAbercrombie & Fitch dividend yieldEnerpac Tool dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROEEnerpac Tool ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginEnerpac Tool operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthEnerpac Tool revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowEnerpac Tool free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.