Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS)
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Carpenter Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: ANF is classified in Consumer Cyclical; CRS is classified in Basic Materials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$145.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ANF vs CRS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yANF +873.4% (+25.6%/yr)CRS +1295.2% (+30.2%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
ANF CRS
ANF vs CRS: by the numbers
- •CRS is the larger company ($22.02B vs $6.45B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.43 vs 42.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (16.96% vs 10.04% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.19% vs 8.28% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.43 | 42.13 |
| Forward P/E | 11.27 | 33.23 |
| P/S ratio | 1.21 | 7.05 |
| P/B ratio | 4.76 | 9.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.95 | 26.28 |
| FCF yield | 8.78% | 1.65% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 62.88% | 30.58% |
| Operating margin | 13.66% | 22.47% |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 16.96% |
| ROE | 39.57% | 23.78% |
| ROIC | 20.97% | 17.08% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANF | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.18% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.60% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.28% | 16.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 61.20% | 178.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.77% | 19.37% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 32.24% | 71.94% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or CRS?
- ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.43 and CRS at 42.13. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or CRS?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus CRS at 16.19%.
- Does ANF or CRS pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is ANF or CRS more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus CRS at 16.96%.
- How have ANF and CRS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 25.69% and CRS delivered 30.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioCarpenter Technology P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROECarpenter Technology ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginCarpenter Technology operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthCarpenter Technology revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowCarpenter Technology free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & Carpenter Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.