Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN)
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Churchill Downs Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$141.40Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
$77.57Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ANF vs CHDN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yANF +952.9% (+26.5%/yr)CHDN +235.9% (+12.9%/yr)ANF compounded faster over this window
ANF CHDN
ANF vs CHDN: by the numbers
- •ANF is the larger company ($6.28B vs $5.41B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.11 vs 13.28 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CHDN converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 10.04% net margin).
- •CHDN grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.51% vs 8.28% CAGR).
- •CHDN pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | CHDN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.11 | 13.28 |
| Forward P/E | 10.98 | 11.14 |
| P/S ratio | 1.18 | 1.81 |
| P/B ratio | 4.64 | 4.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.76 | 10.40 |
| FCF yield | 9.02% | 7.08% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | CHDN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 62.88% | 33.58% |
| Operating margin | 13.66% | 24.21% |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 13.69% |
| ROE | 39.57% | 30.55% |
| ROIC | 20.97% | 7.53% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANF | CHDN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.56% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.50% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | CHDN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.28% | 15.51% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.77% | 21.79% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 29.27% | -8.47% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANF or CHDN?
- ANF has the lower trailing P/E: ANF trades at 12.11 and CHDN at 13.28. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or CHDN?
- Over the past five years, CHDN grew revenue faster — ANF at a 8.28% CAGR versus CHDN at 15.51%.
- Does ANF or CHDN pay a bigger dividend?
- CHDN pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is ANF or CHDN more profitable?
- CHDN runs the higher net margin — ANF at 10.04% versus CHDN at 13.69%.
- How have ANF and CHDN total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ANF delivered 26.29% and CHDN delivered 13.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioChurchill Downs P/E ratioChurchill Downs dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROEChurchill Downs ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginChurchill Downs operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthChurchill Downs revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowChurchill Downs free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & Churchill Downs appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 5, 2026.