Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
ANET leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics, though TXN is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Arista Networks, Inc. and Texas Instruments Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$163.24Technology
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$301.12Technology
Total return — ANET vs TXN
growth of $100 · last 12yANET +4645.3%TXN +535.3%ANET compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ANET TXN
ANET vs TXN: by the numbers
- •TXN is the larger company ($274.05B vs $205.55B market cap).
- •TXN trades at the lower earnings multiple (51.47 vs 55.90 P/E).
- •ANET converts more revenue to profit (38.32% vs 29.11% net margin).
- •ANET grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.58% vs 3.64% CAGR).
- •TXN pays a dividend (1.87% yield) while ANET does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ANET or TXN?
Metric tally: ANET 11 · TXN 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTXN(lower P/E)
GrowthANET(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityANET(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANET | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 55.90 | 51.47● |
| Forward P/E | 44.98 | 33.67● |
| P/S ratio | 21.41 | 14.93● |
| P/B ratio | 15.42● | 16.40 |
| PEG ratio | 2.05● | 7.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 44.36 | 34.60● |
| FCF yield | 2.54%● | 1.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANET | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 63.54%● | 57.32% |
| Operating margin | 42.79%● | 35.29% |
| Net margin | 38.32%● | 29.11% |
| ROE | 27.59% | 31.99%● |
| ROIC | 22.64%● | 16.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANET | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.87% |
| Payout ratio | — | 103.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANET | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 31.58%● | 3.64% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 39.94%● | -2.07% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 46.68%● | -10.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 48.29%● | 12.95% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ANET or TXN?
- It depends on your goal. value: TXN (lower P/E); growth: ANET (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ANET (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ANET leads 11 to 5.
- Is ANET or TXN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TXN is cheaper: ANET trades at a 55.90 P/E and TXN at 51.47.
- Which has grown faster, ANET or TXN?
- Over the past five years, ANET grew revenue faster — ANET at a 31.58% CAGR versus TXN at 3.64%.
- Does ANET or TXN pay a bigger dividend?
- TXN pays a dividend (1.87% yield) while ANET does not currently pay one.
- Is ANET or TXN more profitable?
- ANET runs the higher net margin — ANET at 38.32% versus TXN at 29.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, ANET or TXN?
- Over the past 10-year, ANET delivered the higher annualized total return — ANET at 42.96% versus TXN at 20.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arista Networks P/E ratioTexas Instruments P/E ratioArista Networks dividend yieldTexas Instruments dividend yieldArista Networks ROETexas Instruments ROEArista Networks operating marginTexas Instruments operating marginArista Networks revenue growthTexas Instruments revenue growthArista Networks free cash flowTexas Instruments free cash flow
Arista Networks & Texas Instruments appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.