Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
A side-by-side comparison of Arista Networks, Inc. and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: ANET is classified in Technology; NMS is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$169.71TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.08Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ANET vs NMS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 12yANET +3128.0%NMS +45.7%ANET compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ANET NMS
ANET vs NMS: by the numbers
- •ANET is the larger company ($213.69B vs $77M market cap).
- •NMS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.31 vs 58.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NMS converts more revenue to profit (87.52% vs 38.32% net margin).
- •ANET grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.58% vs 9.23% CAGR).
- •NMS pays a dividend (6.68% yield), while ANET has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANET | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 58.48 | 11.31 |
| Forward P/E | 46.92 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 22.40 | 9.99 |
| P/B ratio | 16.13 | 1.01 |
| PEG ratio | 2.05 | 2.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 50.68 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 2.43% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | ANET | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 63.54% | -4.36% |
| Operating margin | 42.79% | -12.54% |
| Net margin | 38.32% | 87.52% |
| ROE | 27.59% | 8.85% |
| ROIC | 22.64% | -0.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | ANET | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 6.68% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANET | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 31.58% | 9.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 39.94% | -22.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 46.68% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 48.81% | 0.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ANET or NMS?
- NMS has the lower trailing P/E: ANET trades at 58.48 and NMS at 11.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ANET or NMS?
- Over the past five years, ANET grew revenue faster — ANET at a 31.58% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.
- Does ANET or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- NMS pays a dividend (6.68% yield), while ANET has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is ANET or NMS more profitable?
- NMS runs the higher net margin — ANET at 38.32% versus NMS at 87.52%.
- How have ANET and NMS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ANET delivered 44.12% and NMS delivered 1.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arista Networks P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioArista Networks dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldArista Networks ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEArista Networks operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginArista Networks revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthArista Networks free cash flowNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
Arista Networks & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.