Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) vs Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
MU leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics, though AMZN is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Amazon.com, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Not enough overlapping price history to compare AMZN and MU.
AMZN vs MU: by the numbers
- •AMZN is the larger company ($2.57T vs $1.11T market cap).
- •AMZN trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.53 vs 46.32 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 12.22% net margin).
- •MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 12.13% CAGR).
- •MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while AMZN does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AMZN or MU?
Metric tally: AMZN 5 · MU 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAMZN(lower P/E)
GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMU(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AMZN | MU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.53● | 46.32 |
| Forward P/E | 23.71 | — |
| P/S ratio | 3.49● | 19.25 |
| P/B ratio | 5.87● | 15.44 |
| PEG ratio | 1.10 | 0.02● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.34● | 30.08 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMZN | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.60% | 58.44%● |
| Operating margin | 11.50% | 48.52%● |
| Net margin | 12.22% | 41.49%● |
| ROE | 20.55% | 33.28%● |
| ROIC | 10.70% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AMZN | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.05% |
| Payout ratio | — | 6.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMZN | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.13% | 20.34%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.90%● | 5.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.57% | 140.90%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.35% | 66.18%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMZN or MU?
- It depends on your goal. value: AMZN (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 9 to 5.
- Is AMZN or MU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AMZN is cheaper: AMZN trades at a 28.53 P/E and MU at 46.32.
- Which has grown faster, AMZN or MU?
- Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — AMZN at a 12.13% CAGR versus MU at 20.34%.
- Does AMZN or MU pay a bigger dividend?
- MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while AMZN does not currently pay one.
- Is AMZN or MU more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — AMZN at 12.22% versus MU at 41.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMZN or MU?
- Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — AMZN at 20.84% versus MU at 55.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Amazon.com P/E ratioMicron Technology P/E ratioAmazon.com dividend yieldMicron Technology dividend yieldAmazon.com ROEMicron Technology ROEAmazon.com operating marginMicron Technology operating marginAmazon.com revenue growthMicron Technology revenue growthAmazon.com free cash flowMicron Technology free cash flow
Amazon.com & Micron Technology appear in these rankings
Fastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE StocksHighest Operating Margin StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.