American Tower Corporation (AMT) vs BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT)

A side-by-side comparison of American Tower Corporation and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: AMT is classified in Real Estate; BGT is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnAMT vs BGT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
AMT +105.4% (+7.5%/yr)BGT +89.5% (+6.6%/yr)AMT compounded faster over this window
100150200250300Start $10020182020202220242026$205$190
AMT BGT

AMT vs BGT: by the numbers

  • AMT is the larger company ($82.87B vs $328M market cap).
  • BGT converts more revenue to profit (73.11% vs 30.88% net margin).
  • AMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.95% vs 1.46% CAGR).
  • BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.17% vs 3.92%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAMTBGT
P/E ratio24.46N/A
Forward P/E25.52N/A
P/S ratio7.57N/A
P/B ratio22.280.99
EV / EBITDA18.15N/A
FCF yield4.78%N/A

For REITs like American Tower Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricAMTBGT
Gross margin73.19%84.12%
Operating margin44.40%90.60%
Net margin30.88%73.11%
ROE90.83%7.53%
ROIC7.27%N/A

Dividends

MetricAMTBGT
Dividend yield3.92%13.17%
Payout ratio96.01%N/A

American Tower Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricAMTBGT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)4.95%1.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)7.23%43.50%
FCF CAGR (5Y)6.23%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)-6.67%6.66%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AMT or BGT?
Over the past five years, AMT grew revenue faster — AMT at a 4.95% CAGR versus BGT at 1.46%.
Does AMT or BGT pay a bigger dividend?
AMT yields 3.92% and BGT yields 13.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AMT or BGT more profitable?
BGT runs the higher net margin — AMT at 30.88% versus BGT at 73.11%.
How have AMT and BGT total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, AMT delivered 7.61% and BGT delivered 6.61% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.