Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMSC or HLMN?

AMSC has the lower trailing P/E: AMSC trades at 10.52 and HLMN at 32.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AMSC or HLMN?

Over the past five years, AMSC grew revenue faster — AMSC at a 28.57% CAGR versus HLMN at 8.07%.

Is AMSC or HLMN more profitable?

AMSC runs the higher net margin — AMSC at 42.56% versus HLMN at 2.57%.

How have AMSC and HLMN total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, AMSC delivered 16.27% and HLMN delivered -9.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) vs Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN)

A side-by-side comparison of American Superconductor Corporation and Hillman Solutions Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AMSC

American Superconductor Corporation

$1.54B

$31.85IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

HLMN

Hillman Solutions Corp.

$1.38B

$7.04IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AMSC vs HLMN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

AMSC +68.0% (+9.0%/yr)HLMN -29.1% (-5.6%/yr)AMSC compounded faster over this window

AMSC HLMN

AMSC vs HLMN: by the numbers

•AMSC is the larger company ($1.54B vs $1.38B market cap).
•AMSC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.52 vs 32.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AMSC converts more revenue to profit (42.56% vs 2.57% net margin).
•AMSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.57% vs 8.07% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AMSC	HLMN
P/E ratio	10.52	32.29
Forward P/E	36.28	12.00
P/S ratio	4.81	0.86
P/B ratio	2.70	1.13
EV / EBITDA	48.35	8.30
FCF yield	1.33%	4.42%

Profitability

Metric	AMSC	HLMN
Gross margin	28.18%	45.81%
Operating margin	6.16%	7.01%
Net margin	42.56%	2.57%
ROE	23.86%	3.36%
ROIC	3.18%	3.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMSC	HLMN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.57%	8.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-5.61%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.27%	-9.48%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMSC or HLMN?: AMSC has the lower trailing P/E: AMSC trades at 10.52 and HLMN at 32.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AMSC or HLMN?: Over the past five years, AMSC grew revenue faster — AMSC at a 28.57% CAGR versus HLMN at 8.07%.
Is AMSC or HLMN more profitable?: AMSC runs the higher net margin — AMSC at 42.56% versus HLMN at 2.57%.
How have AMSC and HLMN total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, AMSC delivered 16.27% and HLMN delivered -9.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMSC analysis Full HLMN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

American Superconductor P/E ratio Hillman Solutions P/E ratio American Superconductor ROE Hillman Solutions ROE American Superconductor operating margin Hillman Solutions operating margin American Superconductor revenue growth Hillman Solutions revenue growth American Superconductor free cash flow Hillman Solutions free cash flow

American Superconductor & Hillman Solutions appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.