Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMRC or HLMN?

HLMN has the lower trailing P/E: AMRC trades at 42.93 and HLMN at 32.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AMRC or HLMN?

Over the past five years, AMRC grew revenue faster — AMRC at a 12.51% CAGR versus HLMN at 8.07%.

Is AMRC or HLMN more profitable?

HLMN runs the higher net margin — AMRC at 1.40% versus HLMN at 2.57%.

How have AMRC and HLMN total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, AMRC delivered -18.27% and HLMN delivered -9.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) vs Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN)

A side-by-side comparison of Ameresco, Inc. and Hillman Solutions Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AMRC

Ameresco, Inc.

$1.18B

$22.33IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:35 PM EDT

HLMN

Hillman Solutions Corp.

$1.38B

$7.05IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:35 PM EDT

Total return — AMRC vs HLMN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

AMRC -51.7% (-11.4%/yr)HLMN -29.1% (-5.6%/yr)HLMN compounded faster over this window

AMRC HLMN

AMRC vs HLMN: by the numbers

•HLMN is the larger company ($1.38B vs $1.18B market cap).
•HLMN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.35 vs 42.93 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•HLMN converts more revenue to profit (2.57% vs 1.40% net margin).
•AMRC grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.51% vs 8.07% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AMRC	HLMN
P/E ratio	42.93	32.35
Forward P/E	18.01	12.02
P/S ratio	0.59	0.86
P/B ratio	0.88	1.13
EV / EBITDA	11.99	8.31
FCF yield	N/A	4.41%

Profitability

Metric	AMRC	HLMN
Gross margin	16.13%	45.81%
Operating margin	6.99%	7.01%
Net margin	1.40%	2.57%
ROE	2.10%	3.36%
ROIC	3.54%	3.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMRC	HLMN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.51%	8.07%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-5.76%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-5.61%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.27%	-9.48%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMRC or HLMN?: HLMN has the lower trailing P/E: AMRC trades at 42.93 and HLMN at 32.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AMRC or HLMN?: Over the past five years, AMRC grew revenue faster — AMRC at a 12.51% CAGR versus HLMN at 8.07%.
Is AMRC or HLMN more profitable?: HLMN runs the higher net margin — AMRC at 1.40% versus HLMN at 2.57%.
How have AMRC and HLMN total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, AMRC delivered -18.27% and HLMN delivered -9.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMRC analysis Full HLMN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ameresco P/E ratio Hillman Solutions P/E ratio Ameresco ROE Hillman Solutions ROE Ameresco operating margin Hillman Solutions operating margin Ameresco revenue growth Hillman Solutions revenue growth Ameresco free cash flow Hillman Solutions free cash flow

Ameresco & Hillman Solutions appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 5, 2026.