Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) vs Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. (CGEM)

A side-by-side comparison of Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — AMPH vs CGEM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
AMPH +26.7% (+4.0%/yr)CGEM -46.4% (-9.9%/yr)AMPH compounded faster over this window
0100200300Start $10020222023202420252026$127$54
AMPH CGEM

AMPH vs CGEM: by the numbers

  • •AMPH is the larger company ($1.12B vs $986M market cap).
  • •AMPH is profitable (10.76% net margin) while CGEM runs a net loss (0.00%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAMPHCGEM
P/E ratio15.01N/A
Forward P/E8.54N/A
PEG ratio0.11N/A
P/S ratio1.53N/A
P/B ratio1.463.06
EV / EBITDA8.82N/A
FCF yield13.67%N/A

Profitability

MetricAMPHCGEM
Gross margin47.68%0.00%
Operating margin15.66%0.00%
Net margin10.76%0.00%
ROE10.23%-63.62%
ROIC5.93%-68.64%

Growth (annualized)

MetricAMPHCGEM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)13.71%N/A
EPS CAGR (5Y)134.23%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)23.90%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)6.13%-7.48%

Frequently asked

Is AMPH or CGEM more profitable?
AMPH runs the higher net margin — AMPH at 10.76% versus CGEM at 0.00%.
How have AMPH and CGEM total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, AMPH delivered 6.13% and CGEM delivered -7.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.