AMETEK, Inc. (AME) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
A side-by-side comparison of AMETEK, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
$234.20IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$111.76IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AME vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yAME +402.6% (+17.5%/yr)TRI +165.6% (+10.3%/yr)AME compounded faster over this window
AME TRI
AME vs TRI: by the numbers
- •AME is the larger company ($53.68B vs $48.79B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.31 vs 34.09 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (21.22% vs 20.04% net margin).
- •AME grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.80% vs 4.88% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (3.73% vs 0.56%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AME | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.09 | 28.31 |
| Forward P/E | 28.01 | 23.74 |
| P/S ratio | 6.82 | 5.93 |
| P/B ratio | 4.76 | 4.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.39 | 15.63 |
| FCF yield | 3.40% | 4.77% |
Profitability
| Metric | AME | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.58% | 75.80% |
| Operating margin | 26.13% | 27.64% |
| Net margin | 20.04% | 21.22% |
| ROE | 14.00% | 14.96% |
| ROIC | 11.38% | 11.04% |
Dividends
| Metric | AME | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 3.73% |
| Payout ratio | 20.25% | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AME | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.80% | 4.88% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.06% | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.13% | 9.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.15% | -1.50% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AME or TRI?
- TRI has the lower trailing P/E: AME trades at 34.09 and TRI at 28.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AME or TRI?
- Over the past five years, AME grew revenue faster — AME at a 9.80% CAGR versus TRI at 4.88%.
- Does AME or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- AME yields 0.56% and TRI yields 3.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AME or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.04% versus TRI at 21.22%.
- How have AME and TRI total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AME delivered 17.64% and TRI delivered 10.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
AMETEK P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioAMETEK dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldAMETEK ROEThomson Reuters ROEAMETEK operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginAMETEK revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthAMETEK free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
AMETEK & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.