AMETEK, Inc. (AME) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)
AME leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though LHX is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of AMETEK, Inc. and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AME vs LHX
growth of $100 · last 30yAME +7110.2%LHX +2315.9%AME compounded faster
AME LHX
AME vs LHX: by the numbers
- •LHX is the larger company ($57.34B vs $52.06B market cap).
- •LHX trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.42 vs 34.31 P/E).
- •AME converts more revenue to profit (20.11% vs 7.71% net margin).
- •AME grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.78% vs 4.38% CAGR).
- •LHX pays the higher dividend yield (1.59% vs 0.42%).
Which is better, AME or LHX?
Metric tally: AME 10 · LHX 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLHX(lower P/E)
GrowthAME(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLHX(higher dividend yield)
QualityAME(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AME | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.31 | 33.42● |
| Forward P/E | 25.78 | 22.52● |
| P/S ratio | 6.87 | 2.58● |
| P/B ratio | 4.78 | 2.94● |
| PEG ratio | 4.05● | 4.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.88 | 17.85● |
| FCF yield | 3.26% | 4.47%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AME | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.56%● | 25.26% |
| Operating margin | 26.17%● | 9.93% |
| Net margin | 20.11%● | 7.71% |
| ROE | 13.99%● | 8.80% |
| ROIC | 11.04%● | 5.26% |
Dividends
| Metric | AME | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 1.59%● |
| Payout ratio | 14.95% | 57.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AME | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78%● | 4.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.06%● | 10.38% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.90%● | 0.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.51%● | 8.76% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AME or LHX?
- It depends on your goal. value: LHX (lower P/E); growth: AME (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LHX (higher dividend yield); quality: AME (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AME leads 10 to 7.
- Is AME or LHX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LHX is cheaper: AME trades at a 34.31 P/E and LHX at 33.42.
- Which has grown faster, AME or LHX?
- Over the past five years, AME grew revenue faster — AME at a 10.78% CAGR versus LHX at 4.38%.
- Does AME or LHX pay a bigger dividend?
- AME yields 0.42% and LHX yields 1.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AME or LHX more profitable?
- AME runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.11% versus LHX at 7.71%.
- Which has been the better investment, AME or LHX?
- Over the past 10-year, AME delivered the higher annualized total return — AME at 17.52% versus LHX at 16.45%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
AMETEK P/E ratioL3Harris Technologies P/E ratioAMETEK dividend yieldL3Harris Technologies dividend yieldAMETEK ROEL3Harris Technologies ROEAMETEK operating marginL3Harris Technologies operating marginAMETEK revenue growthL3Harris Technologies revenue growthAMETEK free cash flowL3Harris Technologies free cash flow
AMETEK & L3Harris Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.