Is AME or GWW cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AME is cheaper: AME trades at a 36.40 P/E and GWW at 36.96.

Which has grown faster, AME or GWW?

Over the past five years, AME grew revenue faster — AME at a 10.78% CAGR versus GWW at 9.12%.

Does AME or GWW pay a bigger dividend?

AME yields 0.54% and GWW yields 0.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AME or GWW more profitable?

AME runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.11% versus GWW at 9.70%.

Which has been the better investment, AME or GWW?

Over the past 10-year, GWW delivered the higher annualized total return — AME at 19.14% versus GWW at 22.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AMETEK, Inc. (AME) vs W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW)

GWW leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of AMETEK, Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — AME vs GWW

growth of $100 · last 30y

AME +7382.9%GWW +3408.0%AME compounded faster

AME GWW

AME vs GWW: by the numbers

•GWW is the larger company ($64.91B vs $55.23B market cap).
•AME trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.40 vs 36.96 P/E).
•AME converts more revenue to profit (20.11% vs 9.70% net margin).
•AME grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.78% vs 9.12% CAGR).
•GWW pays the higher dividend yield (0.67% vs 0.54%).

Which is better, AME or GWW?

Metric tally: AME 6 · GWW 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthAME(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeGWW(higher dividend yield)

QualityGWW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AME	GWW
P/E ratio	36.40	36.96
Forward P/E	27.39●	30.14
P/S ratio	7.29	3.55●
P/B ratio	5.07●	16.58
PEG ratio	4.05	1.66●
EV / EBITDA	24.16	23.32●
FCF yield	3.08%●	2.12%

Profitability

Metric	AME	GWW
Gross margin	36.56%	39.15%●
Operating margin	26.17%●	14.23%
Net margin	20.11%●	9.70%
ROE	13.99%	45.34%●
ROIC	10.99%	27.73%●

Dividends

Metric	AME	GWW
Dividend yield	0.54%	0.67%●
Payout ratio	20.25%	26.13%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AME	GWW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.78%●	9.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.06%	22.25%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.90%	7.67%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.25%	26.72%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AME or GWW?: It depends on your goal. growth: AME (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GWW (higher dividend yield); quality: GWW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GWW leads 10 to 6.
Is AME or GWW cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AME is cheaper: AME trades at a 36.40 P/E and GWW at 36.96.
Which has grown faster, AME or GWW?: Over the past five years, AME grew revenue faster — AME at a 10.78% CAGR versus GWW at 9.12%.
Does AME or GWW pay a bigger dividend?: AME yields 0.54% and GWW yields 0.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AME or GWW more profitable?: AME runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.11% versus GWW at 9.70%.
Which has been the better investment, AME or GWW?: Over the past 10-year, GWW delivered the higher annualized total return — AME at 19.14% versus GWW at 22.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AME analysis Full GWW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AMETEK P/E ratio W.W. Grainger P/E ratio AMETEK dividend yield W.W. Grainger dividend yield AMETEK ROE W.W. Grainger ROE AMETEK operating margin W.W. Grainger operating margin AMETEK revenue growth W.W. Grainger revenue growth AMETEK free cash flow W.W. Grainger free cash flow

AMETEK & W.W. Grainger appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.