Which has the lower trailing P/E, AME or GWW?

GWW has the lower trailing P/E: AME trades at 37.08 and GWW at 32.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AME or GWW?

Over the past five years, AME grew revenue faster — AME at a 9.80% CAGR versus GWW at 9.00%.

Does AME or GWW pay a bigger dividend?

AME yields 0.51% and GWW yields 0.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AME or GWW more profitable?

AME runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.04% versus GWW at 9.92%.

How have AME and GWW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AME delivered 19.36% and GWW delivered 20.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AMETEK, Inc. (AME) vs W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW)

A side-by-side comparison of AMETEK, Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AME

AMETEK, Inc.

$58.14B

$253.66IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

GWW

W.W. Grainger, Inc.

$60.32B

$1,277.55IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — AME vs GWW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AME +487.2% (+19.4%/yr)GWW +539.8% (+20.4%/yr)GWW compounded faster over this window

AME GWW

AME vs GWW: by the numbers

•GWW is the larger company ($60.32B vs $58.14B market cap).
•GWW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.60 vs 37.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AME converts more revenue to profit (20.04% vs 9.92% net margin).
•AME grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.80% vs 9.00% CAGR).
•GWW pays the higher dividend yield (0.73% vs 0.51%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AME	GWW
P/E ratio	37.08	32.60
Forward P/E	30.55	27.62
P/S ratio	7.41	3.21
P/B ratio	5.18	6.28
EV / EBITDA	24.29	20.86
FCF yield	3.13%	2.50%

Profitability

Metric	AME	GWW
Gross margin	36.58%	39.40%
Operating margin	26.13%	14.57%
Net margin	20.04%	9.92%
ROE	14.00%	19.44%
ROIC	10.99%	27.73%

Dividends

Metric	AME	GWW
Dividend yield	0.51%	0.73%
Payout ratio	20.25%	26.13%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AME	GWW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.80%	9.00%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.06%	22.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.13%	9.51%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.88%	25.00%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AME or GWW?: GWW has the lower trailing P/E: AME trades at 37.08 and GWW at 32.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AME or GWW?: Over the past five years, AME grew revenue faster — AME at a 9.80% CAGR versus GWW at 9.00%.
Does AME or GWW pay a bigger dividend?: AME yields 0.51% and GWW yields 0.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AME or GWW more profitable?: AME runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.04% versus GWW at 9.92%.
How have AME and GWW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AME delivered 19.36% and GWW delivered 20.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AME analysis Full GWW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AMETEK P/E ratio W.W. Grainger P/E ratio AMETEK dividend yield W.W. Grainger dividend yield AMETEK ROE W.W. Grainger ROE AMETEK operating margin W.W. Grainger operating margin AMETEK revenue growth W.W. Grainger revenue growth AMETEK free cash flow W.W. Grainger free cash flow

AMETEK & W.W. Grainger appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 10, 2026.