Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

TXN leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Texas Instruments Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — AMAT vs TXN

growth of $100 · last 30y
AMAT +13153.5%TXN +4434.9%AMAT compounded faster
05k10kStart $100200120062011201620212026$13,254$4,535
AMAT TXN

AMAT vs TXN: by the numbers

  • AMAT is the larger company ($450.37B vs $274.05B market cap).
  • TXN trades at the lower earnings multiple (51.47 vs 53.31 P/E).
  • AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 29.11% net margin).
  • AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.33% vs 3.64% CAGR).
  • TXN pays the higher dividend yield (1.87% vs 0.34%).

Which is better, AMAT or TXN?

Metric tally: AMAT 6 · TXN 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTXN(lower P/E)
GrowthAMAT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTXN(higher dividend yield)
QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricAMATTXN
P/E ratio53.3151.47
Forward P/E46.3833.67
P/S ratio15.6214.93
P/B ratio18.9616.40
PEG ratio76.907.87
EV / EBITDA41.8934.60
FCF yield1.32%1.35%

Profitability

MetricAMATTXN
Gross margin48.96%57.32%
Operating margin29.51%35.29%
Net margin29.31%29.11%
ROE35.58%31.99%
ROIC21.96%16.46%

Dividends

MetricAMATTXN
Dividend yield0.34%1.87%
Payout ratio21.93%103.12%

Growth (annualized)

MetricAMATTXN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.33%3.64%
EPS CAGR (5Y)17.13%-2.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)9.02%-10.12%
Total return CAGR (5Y)34.01%12.95%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AMAT or TXN?
It depends on your goal. value: TXN (lower P/E); growth: AMAT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TXN (higher dividend yield); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TXN leads 10 to 6.
Is AMAT or TXN cheaper?
On trailing earnings, TXN is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and TXN at 51.47.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or TXN?
Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus TXN at 3.64%.
Does AMAT or TXN pay a bigger dividend?
AMAT yields 0.34% and TXN yields 1.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AMAT or TXN more profitable?
AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus TXN at 29.11%.
Which has been the better investment, AMAT or TXN?
Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus TXN at 20.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.