Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
TXN leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Texas Instruments Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$567.25Technology
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$301.12Technology
Total return — AMAT vs TXN
growth of $100 · last 30yAMAT +13153.5%TXN +4434.9%AMAT compounded faster
AMAT TXN
AMAT vs TXN: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($450.37B vs $274.05B market cap).
- •TXN trades at the lower earnings multiple (51.47 vs 53.31 P/E).
- •AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 29.11% net margin).
- •AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.33% vs 3.64% CAGR).
- •TXN pays the higher dividend yield (1.87% vs 0.34%).
Which is better, AMAT or TXN?
Metric tally: AMAT 6 · TXN 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTXN(lower P/E)
GrowthAMAT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTXN(higher dividend yield)
QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 53.31 | 51.47● |
| Forward P/E | 46.38 | 33.67● |
| P/S ratio | 15.62 | 14.93● |
| P/B ratio | 18.96 | 16.40● |
| PEG ratio | 76.90 | 7.87● |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.89 | 34.60● |
| FCF yield | 1.32% | 1.35%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 57.32%● |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 35.29%● |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 29.11% |
| ROE | 35.58%● | 31.99% |
| ROIC | 21.96%● | 16.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 1.87%● |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | 103.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33%● | 3.64% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13%● | -2.07% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02%● | -10.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 34.01%● | 12.95% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMAT or TXN?
- It depends on your goal. value: TXN (lower P/E); growth: AMAT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TXN (higher dividend yield); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TXN leads 10 to 6.
- Is AMAT or TXN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TXN is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and TXN at 51.47.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or TXN?
- Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus TXN at 3.64%.
- Does AMAT or TXN pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT yields 0.34% and TXN yields 1.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AMAT or TXN more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus TXN at 29.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMAT or TXN?
- Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus TXN at 20.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioTexas Instruments P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldTexas Instruments dividend yieldApplied Materials ROETexas Instruments ROEApplied Materials operating marginTexas Instruments operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthTexas Instruments revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowTexas Instruments free cash flow
Applied Materials & Texas Instruments appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.